With Full Assurance
Published on June 26, 2009 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Religion

"Freedom comes from knowing the truth.  Bondage results from missing it."

I read those words recently from a well known Pastor.  I thought, "Ain't that the truth?" 

Someone here on JU asked me recently how I can "know" that I'm going to heaven since he believes we really can't know for sure.  I refuted that, because I do absolutely know for sure I'm going to heaven.  I have been set free from that doubt of not knowing. 

There are some religious groups out there that teach you can't be sure.  One teaches the best time to die is when you're walking out of a confession booth.  That would be the only time you can be sure of your salvation.  How sad.

I say nonsense.  All a bunch of nonsense. It's a man-made teaching. They are teaching fear and guilt to keep you in line.  That's all that is. Some call it brainwashing.  I agree.   If I must do or not do something to keep from losing my salvation, then salvation would have to be by faith and works.  Keeps me coming!! 

It's the works part, these religious organizations are most after.  If they can convince you of this, you will continue to work and work and work for the church to ensure that your ticket to the hereafter is secure. 

Nonesense.   I believe this type of teaching is exactly why so many are dissatisfied with organized religion.  I don't blame them one bit.  Someday, the leaders in these churches will have alot to answer for.  With much responsibility comes much accountability. 

So what is at stake?  Many things.  Peace, assurance, joy, love for instance.  They all are related.  If you don't have assurance of God's acceptance you can't have peace and without peace you can have no joy.  A person with no peace is really motivated by fear.  Fear and love don't match up well. 

John said this:

"These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, in order that you may know that you have eternal life."  1 John 5:13

Think about it.   If Christ came to seek and save the lost wouldn't it have been wise on God's part to snatch us to heaven right then, the moment we are saved in order to insure we make it?  Otherwise God is taking a great risk  forcing us to stay here and walk thru a very sinful world.  Paul wrote under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit that "bad company corrupts good character."  We all know there's plenty of bad characters around us every day. 

Another thing to think about.  If we don't have this assurance, peace, and joy because it's replaced by fear in losing our salvation doesn't that spill over to worry?  Didn't Jesus tell us worrying is a sin?  Didn't Paul tell us to be anxious over nothing?  How can we reconcile these things if God is holding our ticket to heaven over our heads in the hopes we are good little boys and girls.  If we mess up.....oh well.  Ticket rescinded.

No, the only way we can have the peace and joy and assurance is to believe Christ when he said those that come to him can have eternal life.  When we come to him, he says, we can have life more abundantly.  This is not the same type of life the world offers.  But if we tell others that we can't be sure of our eternal security then it's no diff than what the world offers.  Who wants that?   The world offers, fear, worry, anxiety and hate.  Who needs that? 

Salvation has to be by faith alone.  Once good works are introduced into the salvation process then it gets all chaotic and complicated.  It is no longer by faith alone but by faith and works and to say that is to take the daily burden of our salvation upon ourselves.  Then you have to ask, why did Jesus come to die?  Didn't he take this burden from off our shoulders?  Didn't he carry it instead?   If we believe our salvation is determined by our works, it pretty much contradicts just about every doctrine in scripture spoken by Christ and written down by the Apostles. 

Think about this.  If our salvation is not secure how could Jesus say "they will never perish?"  (John 10:28) If we receive eternal life but then forfeited it thru sin, either by not doing what we should do or doing what we shouldn't do, will we not perish?   By doing so, don't we make Jesus words to be a lie, null and void?   Didn't he die for our sins, past, present and future?  I believe he did. 

I guess it really comes down to trust and commitment.  Jesus is calling us to do more than just believe in his existence.  He's calling us to put our trust in him, in his words and in his death in exchange for our sins.  That's it.  Even a child can understand this. 

"Therefore having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ."  Romans 5:1

"But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is recokoned as righteousness."  Romans 4:5.

 

 

 


Comments (Page 41)
55 PagesFirst 39 40 41 42 43  Last
on Sep 11, 2009

LULA POSTS:

I believe there is but one supernatural birth as there is but one natural birth. Rebirth is to take on a a new, spiritual nature --in short becoming a Christian...how? By our Baptism in Christ, just as He in His Gospel said to do. Persons reborn by water and the Holy SPirit pass from a state of nature to a state of grace.

KFC POSTS 599:

Ok I agree with your first sentence...and your second. But your becoming a Christian by (water) Baptism makes no sense when you search the scriptures.

And the Protestant way of becoming a Christian Assured Of Salvation--- that is, by taking the altar call and confessing Jesus as your personal Savior---- makes no sense to me realistically nor can you show it Scripturally. For some sects, Protestant baptism follows but it's merely a ceremony, declared not part of the salvation process, nor does it wash away sins.

Yet, if you put all the Scripture together, you'll learn that Christian Baptism, instiuted by Christ, was indeed for the Christianizing of man, for his spiritual rebirth and regeneration, which begins with the wiping out of Original Sin.

So that I may be saved and enter into Heaven, I became a Christian. That happened when I was baptized...I "put on Christ" Gal. 3:28 and was "born again of water and the Holy Spirit".

But your becoming a Christian by (water) Baptism makes no sense when you search the scriptures. It also doesn't make sense just if you look at it realistically. That water in John 3 is not baptism water as you think it is. Makes no sense.

Of course water as the meduim used for Baptism makes sense...perfect sense. Christ was well, brilliant, for choosing water. You really need to get over your refusal to acknowledge the use of water in Baptism. Water is the natural medium, the action of the Holy Spirit accomplishes the actual washing away of sin, the rebirth of new life in Christ.

The Bible records that in St.Matt. 28:19 Christ commanded His disciples go to all nations and teach and baptize in the name (not names, btw) of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

In St.John 3, we're told how important Baptism is: Unless one is born again of water and the HS, he cannot enter the kingdom of Heaven.

Then, there is St.Mark 16:16, "He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved; but he that believeth not, shall be condemned." 

And don't forget what Ananias said to Paul in Acts 22:16, "Stand up, be baptized, and wash away your sins."  

 Christ chose water as the natural medium through the action of the Holy Spirit by which a person is Baptized into His family and made a child of God and heir to the kingdom of heaven. That's it. It's realisticlly makes sense becasue God has sent His disciples all over the world to make Christians converts by Baptism. Water is the most natural resource, something everyone has all over the world if they want to become baptized into Christianity.

Now consider this...

Acts 2... which follows in time the happening of Sts. Matthew, Mark, and John above....tells us that after the disciples receive the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, v.14, St.Peter spoke to the multitudes from every nation who had come there, giving testimony about the Resurrected Christ. They asked him what should they do for they weren't Christians yet?  v.38-47 tells us that St.Peter said,

38 Do penance and be baptized everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost."

39 For the promise is to you, and to your children and to all that are far off, whomsoever our Lord God shall call.

40 .....Save yourselves from this perverse generation.

41 they therefore that received his word were baptized; and there were added in that day about three thousand souls.

(By baptism added to what family KFC? Christ's family by becoming Christian).

42 And they were persevering in the doctrine of the Apostles and in the communication of the breaking of the bread and in prayers.

46 And continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house....

47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord increased daily together such as should be saved.

These passages come together and tell the story of the beginning of Christianity and who and how the converts became the first Christians, KFC. It wasn't the Protestant way of holding off Baptism as some mere ceremony.  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

on Sep 11, 2009

Yes, I'll be the first to admit that I don't know that much about modern Judaism (which was established by man after 70AD) nor the modern state of Isreal, but they are not the ones my statement was referring to.

You don't even know enough about ancient Judaism to know how little different the two really are.

You keep mentioning that Judaism is different now because there is no Temple in Jerusalem. Yet you don't seem to realise that the religion of Israel is older than the Temple. Plus I am sure you didn't know that there were _two_ temples in Israel. And the Israelite religion split into two a long time before 70 "AD". Both variants existed after their respective temples had been destroyed. And the parent religion existed before the first Temple was built.

I asked you in the past what exactly you think makes modern Judaism so different from the ancient religion that you claim that it is not the same. But your answers were always some nonsense about YOUR religion rather than Judaism.

Can you explain the differences between ancient and current Judaism without explaining some version of Christianity instead? I doubt it.

The modern state of Israel is the same as the ancient state of Israel, except it is a republic rather than a kingdom. If Jesus is the Messiah, this is the Israel that he needs for the prophecy when he comes back. If, however, modern Judaism has nothing to do with ancient Judaism, the prophecy cannot work and Jesus cannot be the Messiah, because his task of bringing the children of Israel back to the holy land and rebuild _their_ Temple cannot be done.

And no, there is nothing in Jewish scripture that says that the church or any group can replace the Jews.

 

on Sep 12, 2009

And no, there is nothing in Jewish scripture that says that the church or any group can replace the Jews.

I just read this morning from my  teacher Marv in his latest magazine Zion's Hope :

"The believing Church is not Israel; it never was Israel and never will replace Israel. Replacement theology has no legitimacy in God's Word.  It is not only a form of spiritual anti-Semitism; it is far worse, for it impugns the faithfulness of God to His eternal promises.  However, it is equally true that all of the Church's blessings come through Israel and her incomparable Son.  It is that association which will place Gentile believers-the "remnant of her seed" in the crosshairs of Satan's persecution in the last days.  We are already, in our beloved America, seeing the increasing attempts to dismantle Christianity, to re-write the Judeo-Christian foundation out of our history, and the insidious persecution of those who hold to biblical principles.  It is only going to get worse-much worse." 

on Sep 12, 2009

And the Protestant way of becoming a Christian Assured Of Salvation--- that is, by taking the altar call and confessing Jesus as your personal Savior---- makes no sense to me realistically nor can you show it Scripturally. For some sects, Protestant baptism follows but it's merely a ceremony, declared not part of the salvation process, nor does it wash away sins.

First of all...I don't believe in altar calls.  That came about as a result of Charles Finney and is NOT biblical. 

So there you go spouting off again Lula. 

We do not see Christ BEGGING anyone to come to him.  That's pretty much what altar calls are for.  Begging others to come to the front.  Don't agree with it. 

I've shown you many times in scripture (ad nauseum) you just don't have eyes to see nor ears to hear.  Water Baptism DOES NOT wash away sins.  IS NOT part of the salvation process and is MORE than just a mere ceremony. 

""Sirs what must I do to be saved?

"And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved..."  Acts 16:31

nothing about baptism.  It's all about going to Christ...not the water.  It's about being baptized in HIS NAME..never was about the water. 

You just don't get it Lula, because you are MORE content in listening to men than the Word of God.  Plain and simple. 

I "put on Christ" Gal. 3:28 and was "born again of water and the Holy Spirit".

ha!  Now this is funny.  Are you listening Lula.  God speaks yet again.  That's NOT what Gal 3:28 says.  It says:

"THere is neither Jew nor Greek there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female for you are all one in Christ Jesus." 

I'm sure you were referring to 3:27 but still God is speaking.  Anyhow the baptism you are quoting in 3:27 is NOT water baptism.  It's again....that baptism John spoke about and that you yourself quoted..."by fire and the Holy Spirit."  That is NOT water baptism.  It's the spirit's baptism which brings believers into a living union with Christ...nothing to do with water. 

In fact my bible says nothing about water in 3:27.  Are you sure you're quoting that right?  Mine says:  "For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ." 

Nothing to do with "water and Holy Spirit."   Something is wrong.  You are either mis quoting scripture or you are purposely trying to mislead to prove yourself correct.  OR "your" bible is not telling you the truth.  It's one of the three. 

After pondering...I know exactly what you did and it's for the sole purpose of misleading.  You took two scriptures and tried to mesh together to fit what you want it to say.

Congratulations...your RCC must be very proud of you. 

Read the following to go with what you tried to put down from Galatians.

"For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit."   1 Cor 12:13

It's always been about spirit..not the physical.  Always.  Now compare those two scriptures (Gal & Cor) to that one in John 3:5 but keep reading to v6-8 and put the pieces together. 

See what you're doing is you're only seeing the water (physical ) everytime you see the word baptism.  You're not seeing that baptism can and mostly means spiritual.   It's very clear it's the spiritual baptism that's important.  The water baptism is the outward expression of what's happened to us inside. 

And don't forget what Ananias said to Paul in Acts 22:16, "Stand up, be baptized, and wash away your sins."

well well well...are you deliberately doing this Lula?  Seems so.  Or is your RCC bible leaving out part of the scripture?  This is what the scripture says fully...

"And now why do you tarry?  Arise, and be baptized, and wash away your sins calling on the name of the LORD." 

Again. over and over I keep showing you...it's not WATER.  It's the coming to Christ that saves.  Your focus is ALL wrong.  It's like the paralytic in John 5 who was lame for 38 years.  He kept looking at the water in the pool to make him well.  Jesus came and took his focus OFF the pool and onto himself.  The water doesn't save.  Christ does. 

You are that paralytic Lula.  Your focus is on the what and not the who.  Your focus is on the physical water, not the LIVING WATER. 

 

 

 

 

on Sep 12, 2009

YOU'RE BUSTED LULA.    You are deliberately trying to mislead. 

I took your bible, your Douay Rheims that you sent me and looked up Acts 22:16 which you quoted to us trying to persuade us.  You put this quote in:

And don't forget what Ananias said to Paul in Acts 22:16, "Stand up, be baptized, and wash away your sins."

BUT THIS IS WHAT THE DR (your very own bible)  ACTUALLY SAYS:

"And now why tarriest thou?  Rise up and be baptized and wash away thy sins, invoking his name." 

Why did you leave off...invoking his name? 

Because it doesn't fit your agenda.  Because it proves what I've been saying all along...you are saved by invoking his name, by calling upon him NOT BY WATER BAPTSIM. 

Brings me right back to the garden..."did God really say?'' 

 

 

on Sep 12, 2009

[kfc postsed

YOU'RE BUSTED LULA. You are deliberately trying to mislead.

I took your bible, your Douay Rheims that you sent me and looked up Acts 22:16 which you quoted to us trying to persuade us. You put this quote in:

And don't forget what Ananias said to Paul in Acts 22:16, "Stand up, be baptized, and wash away your sins."

BUT THIS IS WHAT THE DR (your very own bible) SAYS:

"And now why tarriest thous? Rise up and be baptized and wash away thy sins, invoking his name."

Why did you leave off...invoking his name?

Because it doesn't fit your agenda. Because it proves what I've been saying all along...you are saved by invoking his name, by calling upon him NOT BY WATER BAPTSIM. [/quote]

KFC,

My friend, you are reaching at straws. It's as simple as this...you are the one who is spreading theological error by keeping asserting that Baptism doesn't wash away sins.  I quoted only the part of Acts 22:16 that clearly refutes your position.

The most I'm guilty of is writing the quote improperly..I should have correctly written it as ".....Rise up and be baptized and wash away thy sins,...".

kfc posts: quote]I've shown you many times in scripture (ad nauseum) you just don't have eyes to see nor ears to hear. Water Baptism DOES NOT wash away sins.

My point stands....St.John 3:5 and Acts 22:16 clearly refutes your false assertion that Baptism doesn't wash away sins.


Now, as far as baptism being an act of the Holy Spirit, and invoking His name, you must have missed my post 577 which was:  

KFc posts:

go back and read Matt 28:19 carefully.

"Go you therefore and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the father and of the son and of the Holy Spirit."

notice he's saying baptize them IN THE NAME.

LULA POSTS:
That's right --in the name of the Blessed Trinity..that's the formula or the words said during the rite of Baptism...Just as Scripture evidences the Blessed Trinity at Christ's Baptism in the River Jordan, the Blessed Trinity is called down and its HIS action by the gift of supernatural grace that is poured on the soul of the person as he/she is either having water poured on his head or immersed in water.[/quote]

kfc posts

Because it doesn't fit your agenda. Because it proves what I've been saying all along...you are saved by invoking his name, by calling upon him NOT BY WATER BAPTSIM.

Knock, knock, KFC. If you put together the highlighted I wrote in 577 with the following passages

St.John 3:5, Unless a man be born again of water and spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God."

St.Matt. 28:19,  Christ commanded his disciples to baptize all nations in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost until the consummation of the world.

you should be able to see that the rite of Christian Baptism does indeed invoke His name (the Blessed Trinity as per Christ's command) while the water is being poured upon the person or he is being immersed in water.

Water and invoking the action the action of the Holy Spirit IS the Christian rite of Baptism...WHICH washes away Original Sin and actual sin and makes the person a Christian, a child  of God and an heir to the kingdom of Heaven.

I never said the water saves so stop trying to put words in my mouth...I've said all along that Baptism is necessary for salvation and water is part of the Baptismal formula that Christ gave.

 

 

on Sep 12, 2009

Don't know what I did but sorry to see my reply to the first quote somehow got inside the quote box.

-------------------------------

kfc posts:

I've shown you many times in scripture (ad nauseum) you just don't have eyes to see nor ears to hear. Water Baptism DOES NOT wash away sins. IS NOT part of the salvation process and is MORE than just a mere ceremony.

""Sirs what must I do to be saved?

"And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved..." Acts 16:31

nothing about baptism. It's all about going to Christ...not the water. It's about being baptized in HIS NAME..never was about the water.

You just don't get it Lula, because you are MORE content in listening to men than the Word of God. Plain and simple.

Plain and simple....That's just it....I have defended Christian Baptism using Scripture and refuted all your false assertions using Scripture.

You said Water Baptism does not wash away sins and God's Word in St.John 3:5 and Acts 22:16 proves otherwise.

You said Baptism is not part of the salvation process and the Word of God in St.Mark 16:16 and St.John 3:5 proves otherwise.

 

 

 

 

on Sep 12, 2009

My friend, you are reaching at straws. It's as simple as this...you are the one who is spreading theological error by keeping asserting that Baptism doesn't wash away sins. I quoted only the part of Acts 22:16 that clearly refutes your position.

you only quoted?  You deliberatly left off the part that is the most important to prove your point.  That's being a false teacher Lula.  You are a product of your RCC.  That's exactly what they have done. 

You've accused others before of being a cafeteria Christian by taking only what they want...well you just proved yourself.  You are  deliberately not only taking things out of context and twisting but also purposely not including words that should be there.  On top of that you took certain words out of  John 3:5 and meshed it in with Gal 3:27 and called it Gal 3:27 when it was in fact not.  That's deception.  And we know who the father of lies is.  Don't we? 

I have given you the benefit of the doubt all this time that you were truly a seeker, maybe just misguided at best or hopelessly ingrained at worse by the RCC but now after this exchange I am convinced I am not dealing with a true genuine seeker but one that is honestly working for Satan for her own gain. 

Sorry Lula.  I don't say these words easily. 

on Sep 12, 2009

kfc posts:

I happen to think Jesus is talking about the water of the word but that's just my belief and that also would fit with the plain reading of the other scriptures. You have to ignore Eph 2:8-9 for it to be what you want it to be and also the fact that the thief never got down off that cross to get baptized.

Jesus said "except a man be born of water and of the Spirit he CANNOT enter into the Kingdom of God." He's not going to contradict his word. He NEVER does that. So how do you explain the thief on the cross? If it's as you say that water baptism is needed for salvation? What about all those who trusted Christ but never made it to the baptismal pool? ...... See how it makes no practical sense Lula?

You must have missed reading my comments in 577 in which I explained that Baptism of water is only one kind of Baptism.

I said that water is what is called for in St.John 3:5-6 yet there are other types of Baptism that are just as effacious...by Baptism by Blood (maryrdom) or Baptism by Desire. God always gave and always will give everyone in the world the means of attaining the grace necessary for the entrance into the kingdom of Heaven.

The Pentitent Thief died clearly expressing his faith in Christ as well as having a contrite repentance of his sin. Even though he didn't receive the laver of regeneration, he expressed a desire to be with God after he died.  His actions proved as effective for the remission of all his sins, and Christ granted him entrance into Heaven. the Pentitent Thief was a type of Baptism by Desire.

on Sep 12, 2009

My point stands....St.John 3:5 and Acts 22:16 clearly refutes your false assertion that Baptism doesn't wash away sins.

No, the quote clearly says:

"Rise up and be baptized and wash away thy sins, invoking his name."

Clearly the act of the baptism is only a ritual used as a vessel for invoking the name. Religion is full of such empty rituals that simply exist to keep people entertained. But the actual power comes not from any ritual but from G-d.

To me it looks like the ritual here is merely a metaphor so that humans can understand what is going on. But the actual cleansing of sins, if it happens, comes not from the ritual but from G-d.

 

on Sep 12, 2009

"The believing Church is not Israel; it never was Israel and never will replace Israel. Replacement theology has no legitimacy in God's Word.  It is not only a form of spiritual anti-Semitism; 

True. It takes away the Jewish people's role in a Christian world. And I think that was probably the idea behind it. Islam went through the same transformation when Muhammed appeared to try to stop rabbis from contradicting his theology based on their scripture that he said his religion was based on.

If the church replaces Israel, the church is free to rewrite anything it wants.

 

on Sep 12, 2009

lula posts:

My friend, you are reaching at straws. It's as simple as this...you are the one who is spreading theological error by keeping asserting that Baptism doesn't wash away sins. I quoted only the part of Acts 22:16 that clearly refutes your position.

KFC POSTS:

you only quoted? You deliberatly left off the part that is the most important to prove your point.  You are a product of your RCC.

You've accused others before of being a cafeteria Christian by taking only what they want...well you just proved yourself. You are deliberately not only taking things out of context and twisting but also purposely not including words that should be there.

You have sorely misjudged me. Mine was an honest explanation of what I did...just took part of the Biblical quote that refuted your false assertion that Baptism doesn't wash away sins.

On top of that you took certain words out of John 3:5 and meshed it in with Gal 3:27 and called it Gal 3:27 when it was in fact not. That's deception. And we know who the father of lies is. Don't we?

Yes, the Scriptures I cited all mesh together in support of the necessity of Baptism for the remission of sins. As a self proclaimed long-time reader and teacher of the Holy Bible, it shouldn't surprise you that every one of the passages of Scripture support and hold up one another. There is no contradciton there. That Scripture  "meshes" together to teach, support or explain a teaching of Christ is the way Scripture was meant to be.

You are a product of your RCC. .......

Thanks. I take that as a compliment. And you KFC are the product of the churches of Protestantism.  

 Ever since your request, I have tried not to bring up the Catholic Church but since you have here I'll remind you that St.Matthew 16:18 plaiinly declares that Christ would build a Church, not churches, as He did, against which the "gates of Hell" would endeavor to prevail, as they have against the Catholic Chruch throughout the Christian ages, but without success.  

St.Matthew 18:17 contains the command to "hear the Church" and that's what I've done my best to do. Romans 15:6 calls upon Christians "to glorify God with one mind and one mouth". The text in Romans alone proves that it is utterly foreign to the Spirit of the New Testament to assume that the will of Christ can be expressed through the minds and mouths of some several hundred different kinds of Protestant churches.

  




I have given you the benefit of the doubt all this time that you were truly a seeker, maybe just misguided at best or hopelessly ingrained at worse by the RCC but now after this exchange I am convinced I am not dealing with a true genuine seeker but one that is honestly working for Satan for her own gain.

Sorry Lula. I don't say these words easily.

Slamming and sniping at the Catholic Church and now me personally isn't positive to the discussion.  Just becasue I don't accept your take on points made in the discussion and on the meaning of Scripture doesn't mean I'm not a true seeker.

The first step of my being Catholic and a member of Christ's Mystical Body, the Holy Catholic Apostolic Church, was my Christian Baptism. Praise Almighty God. I'm in the race, KFC, and will, with the help of God's grace, persevere in the faith to the end.

You spoke before of using common sense....To that I would add right reasoning must accompany common sense in understanding the Scriptures.

May the blessedness of right Christian understanding of the Scriptures be yours.

 

 

 

 

on Sep 12, 2009

No, the quote clearly says:

But the actual power comes not from any ritual but from G-d.

To me it looks like the ritual here is merely a metaphor so that humans can understand what is going on. But the actual cleansing of sins, if it happens, comes not from the ritual but from G-d.

Thank you thank you thank you Leauki.  You get it and you're NOT EVEN a Christian. 

 

If the church replaces Israel, the church is free to rewrite anything it wants.

that's exactly right and has happened (in certain instances). 

 

on Sep 12, 2009

leauki posts:

Clearly the act of the baptism is only a ritual used as a vessel for invoking the name. Religion is full of such empty rituals that simply exist to keep people entertained. But the actual power comes not from any ritual but from G-d.

Yes, the Christian Sacrament or rite of Baptism is a ritual for invoking the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. True, the actual power comes from God.

False religion is full of empty rituals... However, there are no empty rituals meant to keep people entertained in the only true religion of God which  the CC claims to be.

 

 

 

on Sep 12, 2009

To me it looks like the ritual here is merely a metaphor so that humans can understand what is going on. But the actual cleansing of sins, if it happens, comes not from the ritual but from G-d.

Christian Baptism is not a mere ceremony nor merely a metaphor, but the real deal.

Just as the religious ritual of circumcision was the real deal and not just a metaphor in making the Isrealite a member of God's chosen people.

Yes, the cleansing away of sins comes from God.

55 PagesFirst 39 40 41 42 43  Last