Motive Is Murder, Method is Lying
Published on October 21, 2007 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Religion
We know that Satan is a liar and murderer from the beginning. We only have to read the first three chapters of Genesis to see his lying murderous ways. His motive is murder and his method is lying. His chief tool to destroy is deception. He's a master liar; very subtle. He makes the lie sound so much like the truth.

When he wants to destroy someone, he begins by deceiving them. He lies to get his work done. He wants nothing better than to change your thought processes to deceive and destroy you.

Of course he lies about the biggest subject of all. God. He lies primarily about God. If he can put deceptions into our hearts and minds about our creator, he has us in everything else. There are three basic ways he does this.

The first thing is he wants us to do is think badly about God. He doesn't primarily go after the existence of God, although he does that too, because that's too self evident. No, he's too clever for that. He admits God but he wants us to think of God as cruel, harsh and severe. He wants our minds to be filled with negative thoughts of God. He doesn't want us to think positively of God.

In Genesis 3:1 he said to Eve: Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?

But in reality God really said back in 2:17: And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; 17“but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

Did you spot the lie? God never said not to eat of "every tree" did he? That was a lie. What was Satan doing here? He was trying to get Eve to think negatively about God. He wanted Eve to think of God as some cosmic killjoy. He wanted Eve to think of God badly and severely. He's saying to Eve that God is so cruel he has forbidden his creatures any legitimate joy; any pleasure.

Isn't that the same today? Isn't Satan filling heads with these same thoughts? Thoughts like serving God is painful and being a Christian is negative; something that is to be endured. That's not the idea of God. That's negativity being planted in our minds. If Satan can get you to think negatively of God, he has you.

In all reality God said, "help yourself to all the trees but one." He wanted them to understand good and evil from what God said to them about it, not what they experienced. Of course for man to have a choice, he made a choice possible. Nobody can be loyal unless he has opportunity to be disloyal. Neither can one love until he has an opportunity to dislove. This tree was a test. It wasn't a threat but a warning. God is good and the devil doesn't want you to know this.

The second thing the devil lies to us about God is this: he wants us to think skeptically about God. Look at Genesis 3:2-4. it says:

2And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; 3“but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ” 4Then the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die.

He makes God out to be cruel now saying to her, "you can't trust this God."

God spoke and what he said to them was absolute correct truth and reliable. Modern man has all sorts of substitutes for the word of God today. Just a few of these would be....relativism, subjectivism, rationalism, pragmatism, etc.

The law without penalty is only advice. God was not giving Adam and Eve advice. He gave them truth. He told them upfront what would happen if they disobeyed his law. They would die. That was the penalty. No surprises here. Now Satan wants to undermine all this and twist and turn words to his own advantage.

The third thing Satan lies to us about is that he wants us to think suspiciously about God. Gen 3:5 says:

For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.

He's implying that God is unfair. God doesn't want you to reach your full potential. You can be independent, autonomous. Satan is telling her he's going to liberate her. A preacher I listened to said the story goes......Adam's Rib, Satan's Fib, Woman's Lib.

God said to them "don't do it." But all they had was his word, and Satan reminded them of this.

He's saying to her, "how do you know if you haven't tried it for yourself? Are you going to trust in HIS WORD? Don't you know that God has cornered the market on God? Make up your own mind, and you'll be just like God. You can be your own god."

This is the beginning of the New Age movement, Eastern Religion, Eastern Mysticism that has come to the West as ancient Hinduism. All is God and we are gods. We become gods. Panthism is rooted in Hinduism. "Pan" meaning "all," "theism" meaning God. All is in God. God is in all. God to the New Ager is energy; an impersonal force. Everything is God. God is everything.

This is so subtle. We are to be Godly, not God, but as God. God is love (correct), love is God (wrong). Sounds almost correct. Wisdom is God (wrong). God is wisdom, (correct).

This is what all the animal activists are so uptight over. The sacred cows. Everything is God, even the cows. The sky, the trees and even dirt. Now if God is dirt, then dirt is God. And if you're God.....you're dirt!!! WRONG!!!

This is rubbish. Whole generations have been brought up into this deception. Satan has almost deceived the whole world.

A man's religion will rise no higher than his concept of God. Remember Satan had lied to Eve about God blocking her potential? We read in 1 Cor 2:9:

But as it is written: “Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, Nor have entered into the heart of man The things which God has prepared for those who love Him.”

Satan forgot to tell her about this didn't he? Why take Satan's substitute when you can have God's truth? We need not to let that devil deceive us, to destroy us, to damn us.

Jesus said Satan's a liar and a murderer. Don't think of God negatively. He loves us. The cross is a + sign not a - sign.

Don't feel sorry for me because I'm a Christian. Don't let that devil deceive you. Don't listen to him.


Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Oct 24, 2007
although i doubt it'll shed much light on how he named species not in existence yet but here now.


can you name a few that you are speaking of?
on Oct 24, 2007
The first wife of Adam...not in your standard Bible


stop right there.....why would I go outside of the bible in the first place looking for another story to strike my fancy? I only believe that the bible is inspired not any outside books that are a dime a dozen.


Amen. Say it like it is, Sista!   
on Oct 24, 2007
Say it like it is, Sista!


why are you so congratulatory? Every time you mention a papal decree you're using something "outside of the bible". Every time you talk about the Nicene or Apostles or whatever-they're-called Creed, you're going outside the bible.

Come on, you and I both know that, despite many protests to the contrary, nobody uses only the bible.
on Oct 24, 2007
nobody uses only the bible.


I do. Am I a nobody....   ?
on Oct 24, 2007
Come on, you and I both know that, despite many protests to the contrary, nobody uses only the bible.


Because the bible, by itself, is an indecipherable mess of nonsense.
on Oct 24, 2007
Nonono, it's an indecipherable mess of sense.
on Oct 24, 2007
why are you so congratulatory?


Because what KFC said is true and she didn't mince words saying it either. It was so good, I'll post it again.

The first wife of Adam...not in your standard Bible


stop right there.....why would I go outside of the bible in the first place looking for another story to strike my fancy? I only believe that the bible is inspired not any outside books that are a dime a dozen.


Every time you mention a papal decree you're using something "outside of the bible". Every time you talk about the Nicene or Apostles or whatever-they're-called Creed, you're going outside the bible.


Yes, this is true. For Catholics Sacred Scripture isn't the only Word revealed by God. We believe that God revealed both His oral Word first by Christ and then through Apostolic Tradition and His written Word, Sacred Scripture.

My believing this in no way diminishes the truth of what KFC said.

Come on, you and I both know that, despite many protests to the contrary, nobody uses only the bible.


Agree with you here as well. Sola Scripture, the Bible ALone, as well as Sola Fides, by Faith Alone, are doctrines of the Protestant forefathers that have been passed down by Protestant oral Tradition. Both of these doctrines are extra-Biblical.

on Oct 24, 2007

Hey Lula, did you ever see this article of mine?

I'd love to get your feedback on the "differences" between religions.


Yes, I've read your article and given you feedback. Check it out.
on Oct 24, 2007
dynomite


Claps hands together "DYNOMIIIIIIIIIITE"!!

I typed and deleted the rest. At least I know when to hold my tongue.
on Oct 24, 2007
stop right there.....why would I go outside of the bible in the first place looking for another story to strike my fancy?


You know there are other stories and even whole books that were written that are actively omitted from the published version of the Bible. People picked and chose what documents they wanted to toss in there. It's not like there are no other texts. Judaism is rich in various texts...yet Christians only bother with the Old Testament...not sure what that's all about.

Ever wonder what's locked up in the Vatican? I bet it's some neat-o stuff.

~Zoo
on Oct 24, 2007
I figure, if God wanted me to read those other texts and believe they were true, He would have put them in the Bible for me. They are not.
on Oct 24, 2007
I figure, if God wanted me to read those other texts and believe they were true, He would have put them in the Bible for me. They are not.


I was under the impression that the Catholic Church decided what went into the Bible for quite some time. Who's to say they haven't censored things? It wouldn't surprise me...they were more of a political power with religion as it's platform.

~Zoo
on Oct 24, 2007
You know there are other stories and even whole books that were written that are actively omitted from the published version of the Bible. People picked and chose what documents they wanted to toss in there. It's not like there are no other texts. Judaism is rich in various texts...yet Christians only bother with the Old Testament...not sure what that's all about.


I've gotten into this on other blogs, in detail, that I've written Zoo. Not going to do that here...but let's suffice it to say, I've done my research and found it to be very compelling. I believe the Word of God (the Bible) is exactly what we are supposed to have. Let me ask you this? Have you ever read it cover to cover?

This past week I read a bible dated 1789 and guess what? It read just like my new modern one. No changes. It came directly from the original Hebrew and Greek.

Satan is the one that messes us up with these extra biblical writings that do nothing but contradict what we call the Holy Scriptures. I can understand today why people are so confused if they are trying to mesh all together. Doesn't work.

on Oct 24, 2007
Have you ever read it cover to cover?


You know...I tried but it's so boring.

Maybe I'm just skeptical...but I never take anything at face value. My brain makes me consider and question everything I hear or read...and then I decide whether or not I want to believe it. I suppose that's the curse of science, eh? In other words...I'll never have blind faith, I need confirmation before I'll passionately believe in something.

I just go by a rough outline of what I think constitutes a good person and that's good enough for me. I don't want to get caught up in theological fallacies and contradictions...that won't get me anywhere.

I think if you look at the commonalities between most religions, one major point seems to come up again and again: don't be an asshat.

~Zoo
on Oct 24, 2007
I was under the impression that the Catholic Church decided what went into the Bible for quite some time


No, it wasn't the CC. The Jews had the OT all put together way before Christ in the days of Ezra. Eventually the CC did have in its possession the whole of the scipture but it wasn't "decided" by them.

The NT, was basically eyewitness accounts and letters from Paul written directly to the churches (home groups) that were copied and circulated. They were called circular letters.

Despite continuing debates about a few books by 200 AD God had led churches throughout the Empire to recognize one basic canon. While Catholics believe the CC started with Peter, the rest of us believe the CC started with Constantine in 323 AD. By then the canon was already accepted.

Later the councils formally agreed to accept what had already been believed and accepted to be the word of God directly from the pen of these Apostles.
4 Pages1 2 3 4