It Won't Be The Last
Published on February 2, 2009 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Misc

Scientist: Terrorists Could Use Insects as Weapons

Monday, February 02, 2009
By Jeffrey A. Lockwood

The terrorists' letter arrived at the mayor of Los Angeles's office on Nov. 30, 1989.

A group calling itself "the Breeders" claimed to have released the Mediterranean fruit fly in Los Angeles and Orange counties, and threatened to expand their attack to the San Joaquin Valley, an important center of Californian agriculture.

With perverse logic, they said that unless the state government stopped using pesticides, they would assure a cataclysmic infestation that would lead to the quarantining of California produce, costing 132,000 jobs and $13.4 billion in lost trade.

The infestation was real enough. It was ended by heavy spraying.

It is still not known if ecoterrorists were behind it, but the panic it engendered shows that "the Breeders" were flirting with a powerful weapon.

The history and future of insects as weapons are explored in my new book, "Six-Legged Soldiers." As an entomologist, I was initially interested in how human beings have conscripted insects and twisted science for use in war, terrorism and torture.

It soon became apparent that the weaponization of insects was not some quirky military footnote but a recurring theme in human strife, and quite possibly the next chapter in modern conflicts.

Insects are one of the cheapest and most destructive weapons available to terrorists today, and one of the most widely ignored: They are easy to sneak across borders, reproduce quickly and can spread disease and destroy crops with devastating speed.

***************************************************************************************

I had to put this in when I read this on Fox News because of my earlier conversation here about the news and how it so closely aligns with Revelation like never before.  In the book of Revelation, written two thousand years ago, looking towards the future it says this:

......and there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth; and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.  It was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth,neither any green thing, neither any tree, but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.  And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but that they should be tormented five months and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion when he strikes a man.  And in those days shall men seek death and shall not find it and shall desire to die and death shall flee from them.......Revelation 9. 


Comments (Page 6)
8 PagesFirst 4 5 6 7 8 
on Feb 07, 2009

if the giant godsent scorpion locusts suck all rationality outta peoples' brains, it would appear they're already hard at work.

when god employs instruments of mass destruction with the intention of scaring humans so badly they agree to his terms, isn't it then accurate to pronounce him a terrorist?

on Feb 07, 2009

There are lots of scripture surrounding this and not one that says that God is indwelling buildings like he did the Jewish Temple of the OT. God does not indwell church buildings Lula even though I know the Catholics believe this as they commission and decommission God everytime they move in and out of a building.

God needs no Temple, House or Church, but we must have places that we can worship Him in common and praise Him and ask for blessings, so that it is on our account that God requires places of worship. For this cause, He Himself designed the Tabernacle and later on the Temple where He was present in an especial manner and they were commanded to visit the Temple. Same with the Catholic Chruch...Christ is present in an especial way and going to Mass is imposed on us as a duty.

God was present to the Isrealites in a visible cloud in the Temple and therefore the Temple was indeed the dwelling place of God amongst men. Now, after God had become Man, woould He have removed Himself further from us than He was from the Isrealites? Are we to have no dwelling place of God in our midst? Is nothing to be left to us but the bare memory of God made man? NO! It would be inconceivable that God, after His Incarnation, should be less approachable than He was before it!! Jesus Christ would not leave us orphans...He has remained with us being present on our altars under the visible appearance of bread and wine in the Blessed Sacrament. There He is in the Tabernacle, His eyes and His heart beholding those who come to adore Him. He gave Himself to us as the Food for our souls.

The Isrealites had only one Temple which I'm told was exceptionally beautiful. Catholics have many churches far holier becasue they are where the holy Sacraments are dispensed by her priests and where our Lord Jesus Christ with His Divinity and Humanity is there present and in the Mass offers Himself for us to His Heavenly Father. I tell you there is nothing on earth as close to Heaven as the Holy Mass is at the time of consecration of the bread and wine.

Every one of the Catholic chruches are solemnly consecrated sanctified to be the property and dwelling place of God and the abode of grace.    

 Lula posts:

So, you can see that the Tabernacle was a type which finds its perfect fulfillment in every Catholic Chruch.

KFC POSTS:

and has no NT basis for it. They don't have a leg to stand on. So they copied the OT tabernacle, so what? God destroyed the Temple that should give you some idea that he no longer indwells buildings. I think he made it pretty clear especially with the ripping of the veil of the Temple in 30 AD.

God was present in the Tabernacle of the Old Covenant Temple and He is present in the Tabernacle of Christ's New Covenant Church and will be until the end of the world as He promised. The tearing of the Temple veil at the time of Christ's Death on the Cross signified the end of the Mosaic Covenant ceremonies and rites and the beginning of the New and Eternal Covenant.    It is providential as the New Covenant predicted by Jeremias came into being in the first century which the Messias instituted Catholic Church evidences. Jer. 31:31-33; Hebrews 8:1-10.

 

on Feb 07, 2009

And your long drawn out response (who's going to read all that) can be quelled with one scripture:

"Know you not that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? If any man defile the temple of God shall God destroy for the temple of God is holy which temple you are." 1 Cor 3:16-17

and just for good measure I'll give you this:

"And what agrement has the temple of God with idols? for you are the temple of the living God as God has said. I will dwell in them and walk in them and I will be their God and they shall be my people." 2 Cor 6:16

Well, in Scripture, there are several different uses of the term "temple" and in this case, you and I are in agreement. The "temple" applies to the individual. 1Cor.6:19-20  is similiar...."Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, which you have from God? You are not your own; you were bought with a price. So glorify God with your body."  

Hey, Leauki, see the Blessed Trinity there!  

on Feb 08, 2009

Hey, Leauki, see the Blessed Trinity there!  

Can you give me three examples of sentences that DON'T mention the "Blessed Trinity" from the Bible or any writing (including comic books) you have ever read?

 

on Feb 08, 2009

when god employs instruments of mass destruction with the intention of scaring humans so badly they agree to his terms, isn't it then accurate to pronounce him a terrorist?

I don't know....I mean if you created something yourself, whether it be baking a cake, making a lego city or building a house and then you decided to destroy it because it wasn't up to your standards does that make you a terrorist? 

on Feb 08, 2009

God needs no Temple, House or Church, but we must have places that we can worship Him in common and praise Him and ask for blessings, so that it is on our account that God requires places of worship

We must have places?  Does it have to be a building?  Let me answer that for you.  NO.  Jesus met with the people in fields, on mountains and in homes.  The early church did the same.  The only requirement is that we corporately worship together.  There's no where in the NT where we are ordered, or it's our duty to build big fancy expensive buildings to worship.  Puh-leeese! 

 

God was present to the Isrealites in a visible cloud in the Temple and therefore the Temple was indeed the dwelling place of God amongst men. Now, after God had become Man, woould He have removed Himself further from us than He was from the Isrealites? Are we to have no dwelling place of God in our midst? Is nothing to be left to us but the bare memory of God made man? NO

Yes, God was present and met with them personally.  How cool is that?  Did I say that God removed himself further by stating he indwells each believer now?  Does that question even make sense Lula.  Are you listening?  I told you he indwells each believer with his Holy Spirit.  How can that be further away? 

The Isrealites had only one Temple which I'm told was exceptionally beautiful. Catholics have many churches far holier

far Holier than God's Temple?  Are you listening Leauki?  I'm not even going to touch this one Lula.  Let's just say this is a ridiculous statement.  Ok?  You may want to do your HW on Solomon's Temple. 

Every one of the Catholic chruches are solemnly consecrated sanctified to be the property and dwelling place of God and the abode of grace.

Ya, I know all about that.  The funny thing is they think they are moving God in and out of buildings when they do this. 

God was present in the Tabernacle of the Old Covenant Temple and He is present in the Tabernacle of Christ's New Covenant Church and will be until the end of the world as He promised.

Now this I agree with but only because the Church is God's people.  So let's rephrase that.......God is present in the Temple of Christ's New Coveanant Church, each believer, and will be until he returns for them as he promised.  That's the seal which is the same way as saying it's a done deal.  Sign, sealed and delivered, we're his. 

on Feb 08, 2009

I made the case in #66 that Malachais prophecied Christ's presence in the Tabernacle in every Catholic Church (a building for the worship of God as Christ prescribed).

You're forgetting something.  Malachai ONLY wrote to the Jews as did all the OT Prophets.  Not one wrote to or about the church age.  They never saw it.  That's why Paul wrote about this as being one of the mysteries of the OT..... of Jews and Gentiles together.  That's why Peter and the rest had such a hard time accepting Gentiles coming into the faith.  What Gentiles?  God what are you saying to us?  That's what the big discussion was about at the first Jerusalem Council. That's what Peter's dream about eating all sorts of once prohibited foods was all about.   

We see from reading Exodus 25 that God did indeed dwell in the Tabernacle in the Jewish Temple (a building designed for the worship of God as He prescribed).

Yes in fact it's all thru the OT up until the destruction of Solomon's Temple and before the Babylonian captivity.  That's how God met with the Israelites.  That's the Old Covenant.  The New Covenant was the indwelling of each believer individually......not buildings, Catholic or otherwise. 

How do you interpret Malachais 1:11 prophecy KFC?

Malachi is a mini summary of the entire OT.  There are five truths taught in Malachi. 

1.  Selection of Israel

2.  Transgression of Israel

3.  Manifestation of the Messiah

4.  Tribulation upon nations

5.  Purification of Israel.

Here Malachi rebuked the people for their neglect of the true worship of the Lord and was calling them to repent. 

I know what you're looking at but it's not what you're thinking.  God says there is a day coming when his name will be great among the Gentiles and the nations but that is not today.  He's speaking of the future Millennium when all peoples, names and tribes will rejoice in God.  God's name is not great among the nations today.  Incense speaks of prayer and is used alot in the scriptures to denote prayer.  That "pure offering" is Christ.  There is nothing else so pure. 

God purpose in choosing Israel was they might witness to the world of Him and they were not doing that so Malachi was rebuking them for bringing God's name into disrepute. 

We know, that because of the sins of Israel that God turned to the Gentiles.  At one point we read that Christ, after weeping over Jerusalem, walked out of the temple and it's as if to say...."the glory of the Lord (Icabod) has departed."  It's now the time of the Gentiles.  He will once again turn back to his elected Israel after this time is complete which I believe is coming to an end. 

on Feb 08, 2009

We read on 2 Paralipomenon 6:1-2 "

What is this?  This is not a bible book. 

I stand corrected on the ark and the glory departing.  I was right on the glory of the Lord departing there in Samuel but yes, I meant to say (and have said elsewhere) that after Solomon's Temple there was no more indwelling of Temples.  To this day no one knows where that Ark went.  That was the dwelling place of the Lord. The Mercy Seat.  Some say it was hidden by the High Priest just before Solomon's Temple was destroyed.  It was never recovered after the return from exile 70 years later.  That's what the whole Raider of the Lost Ark was about.  It still lost. 

I was trying to remember if there's any talk of God indwelling that last Temple.  This would be the temple of Ezra and Nehemiah after coming out of captivity.  The Ark was gone so I'm thinking (would have to look) although they kept the feasts and sacrifices, the indwelling of God wasn't there as before. 

on Feb 08, 2009

far Holier than God's Temple?  Are you listening Leauki?  I'm not even going to touch this one Lula.  Let's just say this is a ridiculous statement.  Ok?  You may want to do your HW on Solomon's Temple. 

Yes, I am listening.

I don't think Lula understand what the Temple was/is about.

And while churches (and synagogues) are new meeting places, they serve only that purpose (of a meeting place) and are certainly not "holier" than the Temple.

G-d doesn't need us to build specific buildings to worship Him.

Neither Jesus nor rabbinic Judaism teach that buildings are needed.

 

on Feb 08, 2009

Terror? Oh you mean that figment of George Bush's imagination that he used to distract us from electing clueless liberals. There isn't really any terra, and that hole in Manhattan? Just an illusion engineered by neocon sorcerers.

on Feb 08, 2009

Terror? Oh you mean that figment of George Bush's imagination that he used to distract us from electing clueless liberals.

hahahaha  good one Anthony.  I forgot that's an obsolete six letter word now the liberals have taken over. 

My bad. 

on Feb 08, 2009

figment of George Bush's imagination that he used to distract us

well, yeah.  iraq = terror was used to distract us from afghanistan.  just ask general petraeus.

on Feb 09, 2009

I don't think Lula understand what the Temple was/is about.

I don't think so either because she's looking at all this thru Catholic rose colored glasses.  I want her to put down those glasses and look, really take a good hard look with her own eyes.  Only then will she be able to see.  This is not about the CC and the replacing of the Jews.  Nowhere in the NT (especially in Acts) is there even a hint that we are to rebuild the temple.

I just finished reading the book of Exodus and God was very clear and precise about the building of the Tabernacle that was a tent in the wilderness.  He dotted every i and crossed every t to what he wished for this to be.  The reason, I believe is because the pattern for this Tabernacle has been in heaven the whole time.  That's the original and we will see it in the future.

well, yeah. iraq = terror was used to distract us from afghanistan. just ask general petraeus.

I think they are not telling us the real reason for  the whole Iraq deal.  The opportunity was seen and seized. 

The primary reason we are over there right now is to  have a strategic presence in the middle of the Arab world.  Iraq is there right in the middle of things.  This is not being publicized but there are reasons why we're over there and has much more than the reasons given.  The U.S being there is critical. 

Has anyone not noticed that we are building the largest U.S. Embassy ever over there?  Why is that? 

The UN is starting the wheels turning into the rebuilding of Babylon which will be central to Islam.  This money is being spent for a reason.  We need to be over there to keep a watchful eye on things so thinks the government. 

on Feb 09, 2009

I don't think so either because she's looking at all this thru Catholic rose colored glasses.  I want her to put down those glasses and look, really take a good hard look with her own eyes.  Only then will she be able to see.  This is not about the CC and the replacing of the Jews.  Nowhere in the NT (especially in Acts) is there even a hint that we are to rebuild the temple.

Did you hear that in Germany many Catholics have left the CC in the last few weeks, ever since the Pope re-admitted a Holocaust-denier into the church?

 

on Feb 09, 2009

Did you hear that in Germany many Catholics have left the CC in the last few weeks, ever since the Pope re-admitted a Holocaust-denier into the church?

No I didn't. 

 But I do believe there is a deep seeded hatred still today between these two groups.  Now, I don't believe ALL Catholics are like this individually but I do believe it's an attitude that has deeper spiritual implications.  I know they've try to undo some past mistakes by admitting them and coming out with the olive branch. ......but it's still there under all the layers and will rear it's ugly head once again.  In Venezuela right now the Jews are very fearful as anti-Semitism is making itself known there.  The Jews are on guard.   

Do you know that is a RCC country? 

8 PagesFirst 4 5 6 7 8