Exactly Who is Going to Feel Uncomfortable Here?
Published on December 19, 2007 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Current Events
I'm shaking my head over this one. Where are we heading anyhow? How slippery is this slope? How much sense does this make? Everything nowadays seems to fall under discrimination doesn't it? Isn't this just another "all about me" moment?

Another news story from Focus and I'm looking at the operative words here......"she" and "men's locker rooms."


A student is accusing Massachusetts' Northern Essex Community College of discrimination for not allowing her to use the men’s locker room.

Elizabeth Santiago, who is biologically female but calls herself “Ethan” and presents herself as a male, said she would feel uncomfortable using the women’s locker room.

The college said Elizabeth could be in danger of being sexually assaulted in the men’s locker room. The student filed a complaint against the school, the Eagle-Tribune of North Andover, Mass., reported.

“This tiny minority of students — less than a fraction of 1 percent of the population — is asking the rest of society to not only affirm them in their gender confusion and pain, but to radically reorder the ways in which the culture makes reasonable and rational accommodation for the two genders,” said Caleb H. Price, social research analyst for Focus on the Family.

Officials at Southern Utah University are facing a similar situation. Kourt Osborn, who was born a female but self-identifies as a male, is accusing the school of sexual discrimination for not allowing her to live in a male dormitory.


Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Dec 27, 2007
the lady stated that she was not comfortable changing in the ladies locker room.


the logical step is she is also not comfortable showering in the ladies locker room.


i did not imply that kfc was going to shower in the locker room. i asked based on what this thread is written about.


Then who does the possessive pronoun 'your' refer to in...

Citizen)KFC Kickin For Christ


so your ready to take a shower in the mens locker room with all the guys hanging out.
on Dec 27, 2007
I'm not comfortable showering in any locker room...


I am ok doing it in a woman's locker room.
on Dec 27, 2007
Then who does the possessive pronoun 'your' refer to in...


i was making a point and sometimes you have to make the person your talking to the object of the point.
on Dec 27, 2007
the last time I showered in ANY locker room was in Jr High and they made us do this after gym class. I hated that. Once, somebody stole my pants....but that's another story.

I've gotten thru life somehow without showering in public locker rooms since then, I betcha I can continue to live out the rest of my life doing the same.

And I certainly wouldn't be found ever in a men's locker room. I'd take money on that one.








on Dec 27, 2007

i was making a point and sometimes you have to make the person your talking to the object of the point.


But there was NO logical progression from the discussion that even alluded to KFC even thinking about changing in the Men's locker room. Your premise was distasteful and potentially slanderous based upon a false presumption.


on Dec 27, 2007
A student is accusing Massachusetts' Northern Essex Community College of discrimination for not allowing her to use the men’s locker room



from the opening of this thread.


no it is not slanderous.


and it is the next logical step.


before to long it will just be the locker room.
on Dec 27, 2007
NO logical progression


Making the assumption that Daniel used a LOGICAL progression is a dangerous thing to do.
on Dec 27, 2007
from the opening of this thread.


no it is not slanderous.


and it is the next logical step.


before to long it will just be the locker room.


I will agree that it 'could' a logical progression for the lady (Elizabeth) of the article but not of KFC. That's where I'm talking about.

Also please note the POTENTIALLY in front of slanderous.
on Dec 27, 2007
Wait, wait, I think I have it. Daniel is saying that the locker room will become one for both sexes, which will lead to the showers being for both sexes, which will lead to anyone showering in a locker room showering with the opposite sex.

I think.

Now my head hurts.
on Dec 27, 2007
I think.


Now, THAT'S an exaggeration if I ever saw one!
on Dec 27, 2007
I will agree that it 'could' a logical progression for the lady (Elizabeth) of the article but not of KFC. That's where I'm talking about.



i was using the word your to bring all of the readers into the conversation not just kfc.
on Dec 27, 2007
Danielost you said,

i was making a point and sometimes you have to make the person your talking to the object of the point.


This was in direct reference to KFC.

Now you say...

i was using the word your to bring all of the readers into the conversation not just kfc.


Why are you changing your story?

You weren't even in context of the current discussion at hand.
on Dec 27, 2007
i was making a point and sometimes you have to make the person your talking to the object of the point.


i was using the word your to bring all of the readers into the conversation not just kfc.



what you cannot use a single word for two purposes.


and the discussion at the time was her changing cloths on a bus with eyewitnesses.
on Dec 27, 2007
Now, THAT'S an exaggeration if I ever saw one!


I'll assume you're joking because we need you alive to start the libertarian revolution.
on Dec 27, 2007
and the discussion at the time was her changing cloths on a bus with eyewitnesses.


I'm pretty sure the discussion was her students changing clothes on a bus without showing anything. Much to the chagrin of the high school boys, I'm sure.
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5