No Logic to be seen
Published on October 23, 2007 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Current Events
I guess this is just one of those headline news stories that just makes one want to bang their head against the wall. Ha! Reminds me of trying to instill logic to one of my boys when he was 14-15 after he would make some illogical comment or decision. Instead of talking to the wall, it was easier to bang one's head against it.

I'm talking about the totally inappropriate decision made by the School Board over the Birth Control Issue for the middle school here. Yes, I'm still trying to understand this whole thing. This committee has failed to protect our children. Leading our children to contraception has done nothing but fail our children. Who do they think they're kidding?

I read a quote today from the Associated Press from one who supported the vote. Richard Verrier said: "It's not enough to depend on parents to protect their children because there may be students who can't discuss things with their parents."

Not enough? Did you hear what he said. Parents aren't doing their jobs so the government has to step up and take their place? So putting them on BC is "protecting" them? This should be a wake up call to all parents out there. Watch your schools people!!

Any loving parent of a middle schooler would tell you that anyone encouraging or enabling a child to engage in sexual behavior at this age is not doing their job. But rather than teach, mentor or direct a child AWAY from this activity it's much easier to placate them with BC pills. Who exactly is benefitting here?

So now you have an 11 year old with her pack of pills. Is she going to be thinking she's "protected" now? What are the chances, first of all she will remember even to take this pill daily, and second of all still insist on condoms for STD's? I mean it's hard enough for them to even remember to take their vitamins or brush their teeth.

I really hate the logic behind all this. "well they are going to do it anyway so we should help protect them." Really? Last I knew it was a state law for a child under 14 or 16 to have sex. It's against the law people!!! So aren't we enabling them to break the law? How do we reconcile it's against the law for minors to have sex and giving them birth control to do so? I'm scratching my head here.......it's less painful than banging.

With that logic, I'd like to suggest we put down a big bowl of cigarettes in their homeroom at school and say, "go ahead you're going to do it anyway. Let us help. It's on us. We'll take care of the costs."

How about drugs? Isn't BC a drug? Why not bring in other drugs? How about steroids for the football players? They're taking them anyway. Might as well help them after we instruct them for proper usuage.

As John Stossell says......gimme a break.




Comments (Page 1)
4 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Oct 23, 2007
I'm scratching my head here.......it's less painful than banging.


That's kind of funny considering the context here.   

*sigh* As for children...I'm tempted if I ever have any to just homeschool or something. I know I can do an equal or better job than the average teacher these days...even if the teacher's abilities are great, the government appears to be fucking up our education system more and more.

In the future, I might just take over the world...it would be so very, very easy.

~Zoo

on Oct 23, 2007
In the future zoo, please leave the vulgarity part out ok?

Thanks!

With that said, I agree with you. I think the parent has the best interest of the child in mind. Not the teacher. Some teachers are very fine, I don't want to bash teachers but then there are some that I don't want near my kids. The problem is we don't know sometimes until it's too late. Damage is done.

As far as taking over the world.....well good luck! You can have it.
on Oct 23, 2007
In the future zoo, please leave the vulgarity part out ok?


What the %&$* are you talking about?

  

~Zoo
on Oct 23, 2007
This just makes me sick. What kind of government goes over the heads of parents in providing fricking BIRTH CONTROL to children?!?!?!?
I mean, college age students, that I could understand. Disagree with, but understand. But the kids you're talking about are babies! Oh, man, I totally agree with you on this one. I might homeschool, too. Even if it leaves my kid a little broken, socially.
on Oct 23, 2007
parents are going to become baby factories.


we need new babies for the next gen.


we need new babies for stem cell research.


i hope you liberal ladies are happy now.
on Oct 23, 2007
What kind of government goes over the heads of parents in providing fricking BIRTH CONTROL to children?!?!?!?


Our government.

Oh Big Brother, where art thou?

~Zoo
on Oct 24, 2007

So is the issue just the ages this is being offered to?  I am sure this is being offered because there is a need among the 14 year olds who are sexually active.  Unfortunately many parents would rather pretend that their child is "innocent" than deal with the reality that they might already be having sex.  Just because you were a loving, caring, concerned parent, doesn't mean that there aren't other parents who don't even know who their child's best friend is let alone their level of sexual experimentation. 

Saying don't do it, doesn't work.  95% of Americans have sex before marriage.  So honestly those who abstain until marriage are the exception.  The answer is to educate them about making smart sexual choices.  They need to know the consequences of choosing to have sex such as STD's and unplanned pregnancies not to mention the emotional turmoil that can come with making an adult decision when you are an adolescent.  They should also be taught about what birth control methods are available, their reliability and exactly what they are protecting you from, STD's or pregnancy or both.   I do think a later the age is for the first sexual experience is better both physically and emotionally but we are sexual beings. 

For the record though I do think this is way too young. 

on Oct 24, 2007

Saying don't do it, doesn't work.

Correction: Does not ALWAYS work.

But again, I will say there is a deffinite difference between acknowledging you cant stop all instances of a crime (it is a crime, you know that right?), and abetting the crime.

This is a case where they have decided that since they cannot erradicate it, they are going to abet it.  And that should be a crime in itself.

on Oct 24, 2007
Correction: Does not ALWAYS work.


It may delay the first sexual experience but statistics show only 1 out of 20 Americans "wait until they're married". So I guess you're right, it worked for that one person.
on Oct 24, 2007
1 out of 20 Americans wait until they're married. But that doesn't mean only 1 out of 20 14 year olds are waiting 'til they're out of middle school. If the small minority wants protection, they can get it somewhere else. Pay for it themselves.
on Oct 24, 2007
Well in our case here, two out of three of my children made a decision to "abstain." So it can work. They are telling us otherwise and we are falling for their lies. I know quite a few young people who are "abstainiing" but it's not news worthy.

I've been to two weddings lately where the two couples waited until marriage. This can be done. It used to be the norm. What has changed here? Have we just given in and given up and lowered the bar for our kids?

For those of us trying to instill abstinence in our children, we are not getting any help from the schools, media or government and it's becoming increasingly difficult to instruct our kids when these other sources are talking over our heads.

on Oct 24, 2007
I'm sorry, KFC, I can't hear you over the offers of condoms to my 2 year old.
on Oct 24, 2007
It may delay the first sexual experience but statistics show only 1 out of 20 Americans "wait until they're married". So I guess you're right, it worked for that one person.


Loca, I think you are mixing too many ideas at once. "statistics show only 1 out of 20 Americans" does not specify children age 14. This applies to anyone.

I am curious about 1 thing though. How does this pill get distributed? Do the girls who plan on having sex go to the nurse and ask for them? Are they given to every single girl in school right of the bat? I have to wonder since I can't imagine a 14 year old going to the nurse saying "I'm thinking of having sex, can I get some pills?" or I can't imagine a girl looking at her new pack of pills and say "well i got this maybe I should do it". Even worse, if it's neither above then when will these girls get it, after they are pregnant? What's the point? I don't get it. How can anyone think giving these pills to a bunch of middle school girls is anything but irresponsible? I can think of several reasons why not to do this:

Overdose
selling them
forgetting to take them
side effects
choking
incentive to have sex

It almost makes me hope for a nuclear explosion to destroy the entire country just to spare the people of this country from a slow destruction from the stupidity that is the Gov't of this nation.
on Oct 24, 2007
It may delay the first sexual experience but statistics show only 1 out of 20 Americans "wait until they're married". So I guess you're right, it worked for that one person.


ONe out of 20 is not one person. It is about 15 million. Learn to read statistics correctly.
on Oct 24, 2007
Well in our case here, two out of three of my children made a decision to "abstain." So it can work. They are telling us otherwise and we are falling for their lies. I know quite a few young people who are "abstainiing" but it's not news worthy.


KFC, did your other son tell you he wasn't waiting until marriage, or did you find out when his girlfriend was pregnant? How do you know your other kids are telling you the truth? And what did you do differently with the third -- why did he choose to have have pre-martial sex despite your moral, religious and ethical teachings against it? Do you believe that more sex education and knowledge could have prevented the pregnacy? And finally, from your blog I can tell that Ethan is very dear to you -- how do you reconcile that God rewarded your son and your family with a marvelous little miracle after your son so gravely sinned (your belief, not mine)?

While I think that birth control in middle school might be over the line, I think that sticking our heads in the sand and pretending like teaching abstainance is the cure is, frankly, silly. I mean, it didn't even work for your own kids (67% success rate is still a D) -- so what makes you think it will work for anyone else's?
4 Pages1 2 3  Last