Perhaps we need the Convenient Truth
Published on October 19, 2007 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Pure Technology
Did anyone watch 20/20 tonight? A portion of it was on Global Warming. Now what? How much more can they say about this? It was on the "Gimme a Break" section of the show by John Stossel. He's usually pretty common sense so I watched.

FIrst he showed the ads that are nothing but scare tactics and then onto the school children, also scared from watching these ads and listening to their parents reaction watching these ads. Then onto Hollywood with Gore sharing his award with the The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ICPP) for the "Inconvenient Truth."

86% of the people now think Global Warming is a serious problem. Really? Once again I find myself in the minority. Fact or hype? Which is it? It's funny the Scientists interviewed tonight are not up in arms over this like Hollywood and the Government are. Who's in the know? The Scientists? The Government? Certainly not Hollywood!! How long will this be debated I wondered.

Of course Gore wouldn't agree to talk about this on a show like 20/20. So Stossel went to some high level Scientists to get the other side of the story. Gore must be too busy touring. Do you tour after you win a Nobel Peace Prize? I dunno, but I wouldn't be standing in line getting tickets that's for sure. For some strange reason, I'm thinking it's right up his alley.

These Scientists all agreed the earth is warm. That's not an issue. There are gains and losses to temperatures, and they're not at all concerned with it. They definitely said it has nothing to do with man. Well that's not so scary. Certainly not like the ads were.

One of them said all this hype is nothing but rubbish!! The IPCC is nothing but Government Activists. They are not scientists at all he said. One of the scientists interviewed had his name on the IPCC list at one time and asked to have his name removed, not agreeing with their stand. They refused, wanting to keep his name on there, (for credibility?) and he was angry. He had to threaten the IPCC with a lawsuit to get off the list. It's funny how just mentioning "lawsuit" changes one's mind.

These scientists receive no money but are getting threatened for speaking out against this whole global warming tirade. They are sticking their necks out refuting what the government is trying to sell us. What's behind all this? What is the Real Truth?

Debate 's over so says Gore....Gimme a break!


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 19, 2007

I always believe scientists...but it's hard to tell who's being manipulated and who isn't...

I know the earth is getting warmer, that's a fact.  The cause is the thing being debated.  Is it people, a natural phenomenon, or both?

~Zoo

on Oct 19, 2007
Yes, it is hotly debated.

Tonight these Scientists were adament it's NOT man. They also didn't seem too alarmed with all the hoopla. If they're not worried why should we?

on Oct 19, 2007

If they're not worried why should we?

Well...we should be worried.  It's causing a massive shift in the artic...as in the lowest recorded ice coverage.  That could have major ramifications for people...not to mention all the artic organisms.  Polar bears are getting hit hard...even resorting to cannabilism in some cases.

Let me ask you, though...did they have any scientists on that special that were concerned about global warming?  If not, then it was pretty biased.  To present an accurate report you have to have both sides of the issue lay down their evidence so that you can decide for yourself.  IPCC doesn't even do it's own research...so they wouldn't be the best source for any hard data.  They do take into account other peer reviewed reports...but I'd like to hear it straight from the horse's mouth so to speak.

Reducing our carbon emissions certainly wouldn't be a bad thing.  Even humans aren't responsible, all the crap we're pumping into the atmosphere has to be doing something.

~Zoo

on Oct 19, 2007
Polar bears are getting hit hard...even resorting to cannabilism in some cases.


They brought up the Polar bears and said the stuff written about them are not true. I can't recall exactly what was said tho, now..... other than they dismissed the negativity surrounding them. I do remember they said the population of these polar bears is on the rise.

did they have any scientists on that special that were concerned about global warming


no, but I understood why for this particular special. It was because we are NOT hearing the other side. The media is always one sided. But it would be interesting to see a live debate done. Instead of politicians put the Scientists up there. I'd watch that!!

all the crap we're pumping into the atmosphere has to be doing something.


maybe or maybe the atmosphere is alot bigger than what man can do to it.



on Oct 19, 2007

They brought up the Polar bears and said the stuff written about them are not true

I went to a lecture last night presented by Dr. Ian Stirling, a scientist who has studied polar bears for 40 years.  Am I expected to believe he's talking out of his ass when he said that polar bears were on the decline because of lack of ice?  Hunting grounds are melting, starvation is on the rise, high cub mortality when the ice breaks earlier than it should...come now, I don't think he'd lie about it.

~Zoo

on Oct 19, 2007
The planet warms, the planet cools, the galaxy spins around. Where's the beer?
on Oct 20, 2007
maybe or maybe the atmosphere is alot bigger than what man can do to it.


Oh...and this...uh, we had an ozone hole issue awhile back, didn't we? Chloroflurocarbons(CFCs) were banned because of that...so we can have an effect on the atmosphere.

Locally we have one hell of an effect on the environment-acid rain, toxic and nuclear wastes, clear cutting, strip mining, and a host of other things. While those aren't on a global scale it shows the massive trauma we can have on an area.

We've also been responsible for the extinction of so many things. One of the greatest examples of that would be the passenger pigeon, a flock of which was reported as taking 3 days to fly through an area. They were hunted to extinction...millions and millions of birds and we killed them all. So yes, people can have an effect on things in extreme ways...it's foolish to think otherwise.

Individually we may be no more than a microbe in a petri dish...but if you get enough of us together we can cause a nasty infection. An infection of one single organ in the human body can bring us down...lungs, liver, heart, kidneys, brain...and the whole thing buckles and dies. It's not impossible for us to screw up the planet, we've done it to local areas, you just have to extrapolate to see the potential.

~Zoo
on Oct 20, 2007
How many years back has it been since the ice age? Global Warming has been occurring since then obviously. Now it hasn’t been that long ago that "scientists" were predicting a future ice age, huh. Solar rotations and money do interesting things to an activists' agenda. If for one moment you think the human race is responsible for global warming and can stop it, get over yourself.
on Oct 20, 2007
Do you believe everything you see on TV?
on Oct 20, 2007
Do you believe everything you see on TV?


As opposed to believing everything we see on the movies?

SC, there's debate for a reason. Because there are a lot of variables we simply do not know.
on Oct 20, 2007
As opposed to believing everything we see on the movies?

SC, there's debate for a reason.


I know. I was being flippant about both.
on Oct 20, 2007
k...as long as you know!
on Oct 20, 2007
Do you believe everything you see on TV?


Yeah..TV isn't the greatest place to be gathering information...especially speculative scientific data. Woe to the sensationalist media.

If for one moment you think the human race is responsible for global warming and can stop it, get over yourself.


Maybe they're not the cause...but they could just as well be a catalyst.

~Zoo
on Oct 20, 2007
Maybe they're not the cause...but they could just as well be a catalyst.


HOWEVER, zoo...stating conclusively that we are the cause is the kind of "junk science" we've all been talking about. I have met very few people who oppose the idea of environmental responsibility, I for one am just tired of people attempting to bully us into living a luddite lifestyle or paying them "protection money" (carbon credits) based on scare tactics.
on Oct 20, 2007
I for one am just tired of people attempting to bully us into living a luddite lifestyle or paying them "protection money" (carbon credits) based on scare tactics.


...and I would not be one of those people. I'm just about trying to figure out exactly what is happening as well as keeping the possibilities open. People who swing to far to one side of a debate often don't bother considering the debate at all, but take it up as more of a blind obsession. You see people like Gore with the mindset of "OMG IT'S LIKE TOTALLY HAPPENING FREAK OUT!!! *BURIES CAR AND PLANTS A TREE OVER IT*" and then the other side of that spectra is "GLOBAL WARMING IS BULLSHIT!!! *DOES DONUTS IN SHOPPING MALL PARKING LOT FOR HOURS ON END TO PROVE POINT*" Until I see conclusive proof of the cause on either side, I'm willing to consider either possibility. It's quite a circus in my head when I'm weighing these things.

Although, I do believe steps to reduce carbon emissions as well as other various things we like to pump out can only lead to a reduction of negative effects that we have on the environment regardless of whether global warming is our fault or not.

~Zoo
2 Pages1 2