Published on November 13, 2008 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Current Events

Change.  Obama's mantra these last few months.    But nobody really knows what this change is all about.  His picking of his VP and that of his cabinet so far hasn't brought about any change that I'm aware of.  So where's the change? 

The military has been warned.  Change is coming.  The IRS and accountants have been warned.  Change is coming.  But nobody knows exactly what this change entails. 

So we're all waiting for change.  Will it be good?  Will it be a disaster?  Well I think I found something that definitely shows change when it comes to Obama.  Finally, and I wouldn't classify it as good. 

Many know that Billy Graham, an evangelist like no other, has been the religious advisor to the Presidents.  No matter the denomination or the political party Billy was on hand to pray with and advise spiritually the President of the United States for what seems like forever.  He's outlived most of the Presidents he's advised over the years. 

This will change with the current President-Elect.  Obama is seeking guidance from the Episcopal Church's first openly Homosexual Bishop, Gene Robinson. 

The Times of London has reported that Obama has sought Robinson's advice three times during his campaign.  Robinson's ordination has caused a deep rift in the Anglican community and is something that is still being hotly debated even now. 

One of the talking points of these meetings was Obama's comment to Robinson that the election was a "religious experience."   Hmmmmm I wonder what he means by that?  A religious experience?  (files away in brain)

So yes, this is a change.  Graham, a very biblical preacher, who teaches nothing but what is in the scriptures has been replaced by a Homosexual Bishop which is anything but biblical.  This is definitely change. 

Obama is trying very hard to pass off that he is a Christian, but it  also seems that he is working very hard to undermine it instead. 

For a Christian who truly believes it's all about Jesus and his revealed word to mankind, Obama is an oxymoron. 

Continuing to pray for Obama. 

 

 

 


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Nov 26, 2008

KURTIN POSTS:

That nonsense you refer to from the Clinton era also produced record low unemployment rates and a surplus, so please explain to me how a "going back" could possibly hurt the struggling America at present.

Did you forget that Clinton went centrist after he got into office or that he had Republican congress as majority?

While Obama is taking on some of Clinton's crowd and expected to move centrist in some areas, he has Pelosi, Reid, Waxmen, and Maxine Waters to contend with...are they your kind of liberal people?

 

on Nov 27, 2008

Obama is seeking guidance from the Episcopal Church's first openly Homosexual Bishop, Gene Robinson.

Seems to me like a "progressive" appointment, i.e. done so that liberals perceive change. Never mind his sexuality, I do not see him as particularly competent; at least not more so than any other random bishop.

I didn't know that Billy Graham was religious adviser to Presidents, but I do think he is as good an adviser as the President could get.

 

on Nov 27, 2008

Seems to me like a "progressive" appointment,

Exactly....but progressing towards what?

on Nov 28, 2008

Exactly....but progressing towards what?

You misunderstood me. I put "progressive" in quotes. I don't expect any progress into any direction from Obama.

He is an unremarkable politician with no achievements whatsoever. His sole differentiation is his skin colour.

Gene Robinson, from what I have read, is also entirely unremarkable. His sexual orientation is the only differentiator between him and hundreds of other boring bishops.

The election and this appointment seem to be very much about a perception of change, not actual change.

Thank G-d.

 

on Nov 28, 2008

Exactly....but progressing towards what?

You misunderstood me. I put "progressive" in quotes. I don't expect any progress into any direction from Obama.

He is an unremarkable politician with no achievements whatsoever. His sole differentiation is his skin colour.

Gene Robinson, from what I have read, is also entirely unremarkable. His sexual orientation is the only differentiator between him and hundreds of other boring bishops.

The election and this appointment seem to be very much about a perception of change, not actual change.

Thank G-d.

I understand your point, but I thought your using the word "progressive" fit. It has nothing to do with his lack of acheivements or skin color...he's not a new kind of politician, that's for sure. Because Obama is first and foremost a typical radical left wing liberal Democrat on economics, the environment, centralizing public health, appointing judges, favoring abortion and sodomy, progress is about advancing these. In this regard, ObamaLand will bring "change" all right...but not "new change". It will be a pick up of FDRoosevelt's New Deal "entitlement" policies, and moving those (progress) into Socialism by way of unions which will regulate the work force.  

Of Obama is able to make good on all his campaign promises regarding abortion and sodomy, Obamaland's progression will be towards the sewer and not the stars and to borrow Judge Bork's book title, slouching towards Gommorrah.  

on Nov 29, 2008

Gene Robinson, from what I have read, is also entirely unremarkable. His sexual orientation is the only differentiator between him and hundreds of other boring bishops.

The election and this appointment seem to be very much about a perception of change, not actual change.

I think so too.  The only change is that we have a black man as President.  At least that's it so far.  That and he's gone to this Gene Robinson instead of a mainstream Pastor like all the Presidents before him.  I think we're getting into very dangerous territory when we are putting people in positions based on emotion or the externals instead of ability and the internals. 

I read in today's paper about the India Terrorist Situation.  Big article in our paper this morning.  In the article there was mention that President-elect Obama has been informed of all the happenings over there.  Not one word about Bush. 

I've never seen anything like this.  The old folks are saying the same.  In none of their years have they seen such an agressive President-elect.  Usually you hear very little if anything before the inauguration from or about the newly elected President to be. 

 

on Nov 29, 2008

I read in today's paper about the India Terrorist Situation.

It's a terrible tragedy. I just hope that India is wise enough to act appropriately and not just take it like Spain did.

I am convinced, btw, that India will do the right thing. India is not stupid and wants to be a world power. And they don't have whining liberals complaining that it is all their own fault if other people kill children for fun.

India bought lots of weapons and military expertise from Israel in the last few years. And in the last few years India and the US came closer too. The prime minister is a Sikh. The Sikh know what they are doing and are willing to fight. India's last president also lead them the way (and he was a Muslim), building up the space program, missile programs, and military co-operation with Israel.

India is ready.

If the USA and Britain become unable to act, hopefully India will show the arrogant British and the liberal Americans what can be done!

 

on Nov 29, 2008

India is ready.

If the USA and Britain become unable to act, hopefully India will show the arrogant British and the liberal Americans what can be done!

I don't know much about India and their politics but I'm guessing I'm about to find out. 

I don't believe there is anyone in the world who has been unaffected by the Muslim Terror that has now been agressively waged with more ferocity than ever. 

 

3 Pages1 2 3