Is That a Surprise?
Published on October 6, 2008 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Current Events

A leading critic of Islam isn't surprised there has been virtually no coverage or action taken against a Muslim group that has been running an illegal "get out the vote" campaign in swing-state mosques.

 The group, Muslim Americans for Obama [MAFO], insists that all of its voter registration activity is non-partisan, despite the fact that its mission statement says it was launched in August 2008 "to provide a vehicle for Muslim-American supporters of Barack Obama to organize and mobilize our fellow citizens to get out the vote to elect Barack Obama the next president of the United States."
 
Continuing, the group's website states: "Although there is only a short period of time until the election..., there is much work to be done for supporters of Barack Obama's candidacy. [MAFO] was formed to offer a vehicle for Muslim-Americans to mobilize quickly and effectively so that our community turns out in great numbers for Barack Obama on Election Day."

 The "get out the vote" events are scheduled at mosques in Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, and Ohio.
 
Robert Spencer is director of Jihad Watch, a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He argues MAFO may be skirting the law.
 
"When they are running these voter registration drives at mosques, really it's essentially illegal because they are clearly trying to get people to vote for Obama -- and that's in violation of their tax-exempt status," Spencer charges. "So this is a group that is crossing the line and ought to be disciplined as such."
 
The Jihad Watch leader, however, figures that is not likely to happen. "...I kind of doubt that they will be [disciplined], given the politically correct atmosphere nowadays," he says. "I wouldn't be the least surprised if no action is taken against them."
 
Spencer contends that if a group called "Christians for John McCain" claimed to be non-partisan and ran a registration drive in churches, it would be all over the media and create a huge scandal and embarrassment for the McCain campaign.

Chad Groening-One News.com


Comments
on Oct 07, 2008

Dear KFC,  This article has as much traction as those regarding conservatice Christian pastors politiking for right wing candidates from their pulpits: both are wrong. But it appears no one really cares.  But I sense that Muslim Americans for Obama is more your point than anything else, as if its supposed to mean something about Sen. Obama. 

 

Muslim Americans are just as much Americans as Christian Americans, Jewish American, or Native American Church Aamericans.  This sort of religious targeting and prejudice does not serve you well.

 

The far right, like that strident Ann Coulter or flag drapped nonsense spouter Sean Hannity who never seem to miss an opportunity to remind everyone that Sen. Obama's middle name is Hussein (as if that is supposed to mean something different from my middle name being Sodaiho) are just pointing out to fair minded Americans how out of balance and full of fear and prejudice thay are. 

 

I would rather see you thoughtfully take on the issue of separation of politics from the pulpit than suggest if one side does it it is bad, but if anothyer does it, its cool.

 

Be well.

 

 

on Oct 07, 2008

Muslim Americans are just as much Americans as Christian Americans, Jewish American, or Native American Church Aamericans. 

and if this article were about Jewish Americans or Native Americans I would have put the appropriate title up.  But it's not.  It's a group of Muslim Americans banding together to push a political candidate into office via their Mosques which I thought was very inappropriate.  I would have felt the same if it were Baptist Churches doing this.

In the churches I've attended over the years politics is left at the door.  I like it that way.  The closest I've ever seen politics from the pulpit is when there was a prayer for our troops or leadership on occasion.  In only one church I've ever attended they had voter guides on the back table but no mention from the pulpit about these guides.  These  guides did not tell one how to vote only showing the history of their Senators and Congressmen's record of voting in the previous year. 

Quite often I talk about "Christians" banding together (as in boycotts) or Jews or maybe even blacks.  It's only for clarification purposes I do so.  There's no deep seeded hatred for Muslims nor is there for blacks or Jews when I do so.  I have had Muslims in my home  as well as Atheists, blacks and many other backgrounds and for long periods of time even.  I even took one Muslim to church with me (he hated it) once when he was staying the weekend at our home. 

I would rather see you thoughtfully take on the issue of separation of politics from the pulpit than suggest if one side does it it is bad, but if anothyer does it, its cool.

and that's not a bad idea either.  It would be a good topic for sure. 

on Oct 07, 2008

Sodaiho, judging from her response, her initial point was not so much that it was MUSLIMS, but that an organized church was doing something to violate their tax exempt status.  And on top of that, they aren't being called out on it. 

If a baptist church were to do this same thing, then they SHOULD lose tax exempt status.  In fact, they would very quickly be threatened with this because so many people watch them for it.  Since it's a series of muslim mosques doing the EXACT SAME thing that would get a baptist church's status yanked, shouldn't they be held to the same standard?  They're not, however.   I don't think it's "cool" that they get away with it.  I think it's shameful. 

on Oct 07, 2008

Sodaiho, judging from her response, her initial point was not so much that it was MUSLIMS, but that an organized church was doing something to violate their tax exempt status. And on top of that, they aren't being called out on it.

Of course not - they are for liberals which exempts them.