Freedom is worth fighting for
Published on July 16, 2008 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Blogging

A few months ago I wrote about California outlawing homeschooling and the scrambling that went on after that bomb hit the public square. 

This decision which I believe has been rescinded or at least stayed for a period of time reminded me about another case in 1983 not to mention Hitler's outlawing homeschooling in, I believe, 1938. 

Back in 1983 homeschooling was outlawed in about 45 states because it was mandated that the parents would have to have a four year teaching certificate to teach their own children.  Again, this reeks of humanists wanting their hands on our children and will do anything they can to make it hard for parents to homeschool their own children. 

Anyhow how many remember the story back in 1983 about the seven fathers who were jailed because they dared to take their children's education into their own hands?  I provided a link above. 

These Christian fathers spent 93 days in jail because they refused to testify against themselve and invoked the 5th amendment. And guess what?  The court rufused their 5th amendment rights. Even communists have been allowed to use this right.   So what was the problem?  Why were they jailed?

They allowed their children to attend a Christian school that had been ordered closed because the teachers had not taken three secular-humanist filled courses in education. 

Also in Nebraska, to give us just a wee taste of secular-humanist-totalitarian abuse of power,  was yet another  flagrant attack on religious freedom.  The Faith Baptist Church was chained shut by the state after 66 ministers were forcibly dragged out of a prayer meeting by 18 carloads of patrolmen.  This act was judged illegal later thank goodness.  The power of government was leveled against a church in direct violation of the first amendment.  This so called separation of church and state doesn't seem to apply when the secular humanists have guns and control the courts. 

Back  in 1983 the school board in Nebraska was completely controlled by close-minded secularists who wanted full control over public education to include all private and religious schools. 

Years and years ago an attack against a church by the government was simply just unheard of but today such attacks are growing in frequency.  I read recently that in the 1970's a total of 84 intrusions into religious matters were reported but today one of the organizations that  keeps track of such issues has over 10,000 current cases. 

Many Christians are tired of fighting.  Many are apathetic and I'm afraid unless we stand up and fight for our freedoms we will lose them.  The secularists believe that our teaching religion to our children is the worst thing that could happen to them.  But we believe, as did our founding fathers that religious instruction is among "the chief duties of man" and the Unitied States was one nation in which religious freedom to teach our children was guaranteed by the Constitution. 

It's for some of these very reasons that  organizations like Focus on the Family in the 1970's and the  Moral Majority in the 1980's were started.  Today we still have FOF and now the AFA among other people to help the Christians find a voice among the secular humanists who want nothing more than to squash what was begun by people who founded this country who had a personal and abiding faith in the God of the bible. 

"Flexibility in choosing curriculum is vital to homeschooling because each child is unique and has an individual learning style.

These types of continuing threats galvanize homeschoolers throughout the country. While homeschoolers are active and engaged citizens, we always must be mindful that homeschool freedom is fragile.

It can be lost without vigilant action on the part of all homeschoolers. As an organization with more than 80,000 members, HSLDA will continue its mission—which can continue only with the active participation of our members—and work with state organizations to make sure we do not lose any of our hard-won freedoms. "

Michael Smith, President of Homeschool Legal Defense Assoc

 

 

 


Comments
on Jul 16, 2008

I have never met a secular humanist.  I can't imagine who all these invisible secular humanist who have so much power are. 

on Jul 16, 2008
I have never met a secular humanist. I can't imagine who all these invisible secular humanist who have so much power are.


Calling secular humanists "invisible" suggests they don't exist, when they do...by the millions as a matter of fact.

While there are several meanings for "Humanists", calling someone a Humanist is a term of honor for most. It's when the adjective "Secular" is added that the trouble begins.

"Secular" is from the Latin meaning "saeculum" which means "time" or "age" and to call someone secular means that he is in the times, of his age, or worldly with no vision of or in the perspective of eternity. The secularist doesn't believe that God exists or acts in human affairs. Moral standards are those merely accepted by society in which he lives and having no enduring or permanent value, those can change.

It follows then, for a person to be a secular humanist, they would have to follow secular humanism, right?

We know for sure that secular humanism exists and has been attested to by an organization call the American Humanist Assoc.(AHA) in its journal, The Humanist. The movement was given legal status by the US Supreme Court in one of its landmark decisions, Torcaso v. Watkins, 1961.

In 1933, the AHA issued its creed, Humanist Manifesto, for the movement.

The tenets of Secular Humanism come from the Humanist Manifesto I and II and in the Secular Humanist Declaration. They are as follows:

The first tenet of Secular Humanism denies the relevance of Almighty God and in place of worship and prayer finds his faith in a heightened sense of personal life and in a cooperative effort to promote social well-being.



The second tenet of Secular Humanism is the belief that man can begin with himself and on the basis of “human reason” alone can think out the answers to the great questions which confront mankind.



The third tenet of Secular Humanism is the belief in the inevitably of progress perpetuated through the Evolutionary Theory and its cultural application of Social Darwinism.

The fourth tenet of Secular Humanism is the belief in science as the guide to human progress and the ultimate provider of an alternative to both religion and morals. Therefore, science itself assumes a religious character and we have certainly seen this recently in radical environmentalism and global warming alarmists.

The fifth tenet of Secular Humanism is the belief in self-sufficiency and centrality of man. This tenet encompasses the assertion of the autonomy and independence of man apart from Almighty God thereby releasing mankind from all obligations to Him. This tenet promulgates the idea that man’s future and salvation is in man’s hands, thus, man, not God controls the destiny of the human race.

Secular Humanism is propagated by secular humanists through public education, the media, the courts, and through governmental agencies.

Locamama, if you know anyone who falls into these categories, then you've met a secular humanist.



on Jul 16, 2008

Calling secular humanists "invisible" suggests they don't exist, when they do...by the millions as a matter of fact.

Have you ever personally met someone who said "Hi, I'm a secular humanist."  I haven't.  We want to make "secular humanists" the big, bad boogy man and I have never met one.  Even reading your definitions, I still have never met one. 

on Jul 17, 2008
The first tenet of Secular Humanism denies the relevance of Almighty God and in place of worship and prayer finds his faith in a heightened sense of personal life and in a cooperative effort to promote social well-being.

The second tenet of Secular Humanism is the belief that man can begin with himself and on the basis of “human reason” alone can think out the answers to the great questions which confront mankind.

The third tenet of Secular Humanism is the belief in the inevitably of progress perpetuated through the Evolutionary Theory and its cultural application of Social Darwinism.

The fourth tenet of Secular Humanism is the belief in science as the guide to human progress and the ultimate provider of an alternative to both religion and morals.

The fifth tenet of Secular Humanism is the belief in self-sufficiency and centrality of man.


There are people at this site who fit those tenets, Loca.
on Jul 17, 2008
There are people at this site who fit those tenets, Loca.


Maybe but I don't know that there is anyone on this site who identifies themselves as a secular humanist. In my opinion, it is a made up label to villify an unknown enemy. I mean, there must be an enemy.
on Jul 17, 2008
Calling secular humanists "invisible" suggests they don't exist, when they do...by the millions as a matter of fact.


According to wiki: Invisibility is the state of an object which cannot be seen. An object in this state is said to be invisible (literally, "not visible").

The wind for example is invisible, but we all know it's there. I always find it disturbing to see people take words and change their definitions to suit their arguments. Sorry Lula, but had to point this out.
on Jul 17, 2008

Maybe but I don't know that there is anyone on this site who identifies themselves as a secular humanist

Some people admit they are humanists but maybe we should ask them?  How many on JU would describe themselves as a secular humanist?  To be secular, first of all, just means basically to be non-religious.  So if you call yourself a Christian and abide by Christian principles you wouldn't fit this description because God, not man, is the focus.

 Lula is quite right about the Humamist Manifesto I and II.   

The wind for example is invisible, but we all know it's there

and this is what Christ pointed out as a description of the Holy Spirit.  Just like the wind.  You can't see him, but you can see the evidence of Him. 

 

 

 

on Jul 17, 2008
Maybe but I don't know that there is anyone on this site who identifies themselves as a secular humanist. In my opinion, it is a made up label to villify an unknown enemy. I mean, there must be an enemy.


It's not a label to villify an unknown enemy. It's secular humanism. Secular, meaning not based in Christianity, humanism, meaning worship of humans. Basically putting humans above God by saying God is non-existent which leaves only self meaning anything. Secular humanism is the enemy of God. Secular humanists are loved by God. It's the worldview that's the problem, not the people who subscribe to some or all of it.

on Jul 17, 2008
It's the worldview that's the problem, not the people who subscribe to some or all of it.


Hmmmmmm....I must question this...

The problem is that the people who subscribe (secular humanists) put the worldeview (ideology of secular humanism) into practice in our society....

Think abortion, euthanasia, explicit classroom sex instruction, and on and on!
on Jul 17, 2008
Hmmmmmm....I must question this...

The problem is that the people who subscribe (secular humanists) put the worldeview (ideology of secular humanism) into practice in our society....

Think abortion, euthanasia, explicit classroom sex instruction, and on and on!


People are never a problem. "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
on Jul 17, 2008
Sorry, Jythier....

You are so right.
on Jul 17, 2008

The problem is that the people who subscribe (secular humanists) put the worldeview (ideology of secular humanism) into practice in our society.... Think abortion, euthanasia, explicit classroom sex instruction, and on and on!
  I believe in God and I still think that abortion should be legal and that there should be comprehensive sex education.  No euthanasia though.  So can you blame my views on secular humanism?

on Jul 18, 2008
I believe in God and I still think that abortion should be legal and that there should be comprehensive sex education. No euthanasia though. So can you blame my views on secular humanism?


Yes.



Note....The first tenet of Secular Humanism denies the relevance of Almighty God, not the existence of God...or believing that He exists....and this is a key point.

Secular Humanism is not strictly atheism, although it's likely that most Humanists are atheists. The authors of the Manifestos didn't deny the existence of God; they leave that possibility open.

The thrust of Secular Humanism is to deny that belief in God could or ought to have any practical effect in our lives...in what we do...in what we believe...in what we condone, etc.

In other words, whether or not God is thought to exist, man must live as if God did not exist.


It would be worth your while to check out the Humanist Manifestos I (1933) and II (1973)...

While there wasn't anything substantially new in Manifesto II, its framers recognized the subject of sex as a key point of conflict with religious believers. Some of it tenets are:

....traditional dogmatic or authoritarian religions that placve revelation, God , ritual, or creed above human need to a disservice to the human species.
....we can discover no divine purpose or providence for the human species. While there is much that we do not know, humans are responsible for what we are or will become. No deity will save us; we must save ourselves.
....We affirm that moral values derive their source from human experience. Ethics is autonomous and situational, needing no theological or ideological sanction. In the area of sexuality, we believe that intolerant attitudes , often cultivated by orthodox religions, and puritanical cultures, unduly repress sexual conduct. The right to birth control, abortion, and divorce should be recognized.

KFC's article focuses on homeschooling and education.

You'll find that the documents articulate that moral values have no supernatural guarantees. This of course requires the rejection of religious morality, like the Ten Commandments for example. Secular humanists say they are no moral absolutes...

It's through the work of secular and atheistic humanists that prayer and the Ten Commandments are banned from public education.

An American philosopher and college professor by the name of John Dewey (1859-1952) was one of the principal authors of Manifesto I. He must be credited with having the most influence over the theory and practice of public education.













on Jul 19, 2008

I believe in God and I still think that abortion should be legal and that there should be comprehensive sex education. No euthanasia though. So can you blame my views on secular humanism?

Abortion would be a secular humanist wasy of thinking.  So if you believe in abortion and SAY you believe in God and his ways you are confused.  God would never never want us to destroy life ever. 

Think about it this way:  Ronald Reagan said this: 

"I have often said that when we talk about abortion we are talking about two lives, the life of the mother and the life of the unborn child.  why else do we call a pregnant woman a mother?  I have also said that anyone who doesn't feel sure whether we are talking about a second human life should clearly give life the benefit of the doubt.  If you don't know whether a body is alive or dead, you would never bury it.  I think this consideration itself sould be enough for all of us to insist on protecting the unborn."  (Reagan, Aborton and the Conscience of the Nation, 42)

A secular humanist will have man in mind when he makes his decisions and laws.  A Christian will have God in mind when he makes his decisions and laws as his focus is God, not man.  So you have to ask yourself, am I making this decision based on man's (or woman's)  focus or on God's focus.   

on Jul 19, 2008

Loca,

I read this this morning as part of my devo and thought of you....

I have set the LORD always before me; Because He is at my right hand I shall not be moved. (Psalm 16:8)

What does it mean to set the Lord always before you? It means that you choose to relate everything you encounter to your trust in God. What you choose to focus on becomes the dominant influence in your life. You may be a Christian, but if your focus is always on your problems, your problems will determine the direction of your life. If your focus is on people, then people will determine what you think and do. In biblical times, the right hand was the most distinguished position, reserved for one’s chief adviser and supporter. When you choose to focus on Christ, you invite Him to take the most important position in your life as Counselor and Defender.