Published on June 16, 2006 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Religion
We left the Prodigal with the realization that he needs to go back to his father and make amends. So back to the village he goes. What should the father do? The father should stay in his estate and when told of his son he should not immediately go out. Let the village discipline him first. Then after a lashing and restitution made, then maybe a reconciliation but not before much time passed. Now for the most shameful act yet. This is ridiculous. The father runs and kisses the son? WHAT? Most likely this son is in rags and very smelly being with these pigs and the father is running towards his son and kisses him all over. In the Greek this running is sprinting. To do so, he would have to lift his robes and show his legs. This was not done. This is appalling. The priests did not lift their robes even in the blood of sacrifices. This running would be considered a shameful act. For a man to show his legs went against all propriety. Aristotle wrote, “great men never run in public.” The father is willing to take the shame before the boy takes on the shame of the town. This is a totally selfless act and crazy according to the culture. We see here full reconciliation. The father has taken the shame. He had always been watching for his son to come home. He goes out to escort his boy into town with his arm around him. The son should have been beaten. This is Grace. The Pharisees did not get this. They did not understand Grace. To them this is disgrace. He does not have to earn back his father’s love. He throws himself to his father and his father restores him. All he did was trust his father. This is grace. God is the seeker. He sees the sinner before the sinner sees him. He runs to embrace the sinner back into fellowship

Here the memorized speech comes out. Most likely he repeated this over and over as he traveled home. But he doesn’t finish the end of this speech. He stopped at the point where he was going to ask to be restored as a servant. Why? It would be an insult to his father at this point. He got it. He understood it, the grace given to him. He doesn’t finish because he sees he doesn’t have to earn back his father’s love. He repents, he entrusts himself to his father and that’s all a sinner has to do. The Pharisees never understood this. No shame for this boy? He should have been beaten they thought. They didn’t get it. They didn’t understand grace. This is Jesus embracing sinners. There’s no plan for restitution, no works, just grace. What does this say about the father? His love is lavish, his compassion endless even to the worst sinner. The point here is God finds joy in one lost sinner.

After his confession, his father eagerly brings him back into fellowship. The only way back for us as sinners is by confession. Now he’s given a robe. He’s treating him like a prince. This would symbolize clean clothing that went on after being washed. We are clothed by the righteousness of Christ after we come to him and are washed by the blood of the lamb. To cover him is to restore his dignity. The ring is usually given to one that has authority in the house. It carries the insignia of the owner, in this case the father. He now can act on behalf of his father. He’s been given authority to do so. The shoes show responsibility and freedom, full sonship. Mercy triumphs over sin. A servant does not wear shoes. His position is higher than a servant seen by the shoes on his feet. He was now fully clothed and forgiven and restored to the status of a son. The fattened calf is usually used for the best and biggest occasion like the marriage of an elder son. The celebration begins.

To the Pharisees this story would be irritating, like church bells to a non believer. The father is acting stupidly. They can’t imagine such a father.

Now enters the elder son into the scene. It seems he is somewhat estranged himself from the father. Yes he was there and doing the work but his heart was not there. There does not seem to be a good relationship with his father. Notice how he went to the servants to find the answer to what was going on. He did not go to the father. He was not invited to this celebration. He’s in the dark. He has no part in his brother’s redemption He sees the full reconciliation between his father and younger brother and he’s angry. Here we see that he’s as lost as the Pharisees that are now listening to this story. This is them. They just appeared in the story. The irony is lost on them. They are more lost than the younger son. The father is embracing this sinner. How dare he? This is what ticks the Pharisees off, Christ embracing sinners. Where’s the punishment? The father is a fool to the son and to them. You don’t give honor to a fool. Notice he didn’t go in, but it was the father who came out and begged him to let it go. The son was angry just as the Pharisees were angry with Jesus. This boy is just as much a complainer as the Pharisees and just as self righteous. He was the real prodigal. To the Pharisees this elder brother would make the most sense. Finally someone who gets it they must be thinking. His father begs him to come in, another shameful act. How far will this father go? The father appears to be weak and not a true leader of this family

We see he addresses his father with “Look.” He was not respectful. His words are dripping with legalism as he speaks to his father. He wanted to party with “his friends.” Not with his father and brother. Notice how he reminds the father of how the younger wasted his money. There are many that are working for God but are just as poor spiritually as the younger son was physically. Here the father is saying I have spiritual blessings for you. Take and grab hold of them. You have always been my son. Our father is rich in spiritual blessings. They are yours for the taking. They are not forced upon us but to be taken by us and by doing so we are blessed beyond all measure.

It seems ironic that the elder in a fit of rage revealed the mind of a slave rather than a master in his father’s home. The younger was willing to reposition himself as a slave while the elder seemed to consider his position a duty. He didn’t feel privileged but forced to follow his father’s footsteps. Many times moments of crises uncover truths. Our sin always finds us out.

I wonder if the Pharisees could see themselves in the self-righteous elder son. They obeyed God, kept the rules of the house, served diligently but all without love, appreciation or gratefulness. Like the elder son they murmured about the generosity showered on those they deemed unworthy. They were bitter, resentful and jealous.

Jesus rejected their preconceived image of God. He showed them a different picture of a loving God with no limits of pardon and grace. It was the father who is the center of this story with his sons revolved around him. We see his revealed compassion for his younger son and assurance given to his elder son of his love and devotion. He refused to limit his grace to the human ways of seeing and doing.

Here we see the story closes with the elder son out of fellowship with his father. The father leaves the door open however.

Maybe you are a son/daughter who went away to a far country and are out of fellowship with him. He is watching for you still. Maybe you are like the elder son who also was out of fellowship trying to earn your way by working hard. He. thought he was serving God, but yet he was not enjoying all the father had for him. He was too busy working. He was missing out on the joy and fellowship that a father has for his son.

How does it end? It just stops. Does the older brother seeing the compassion and mercy of his father confess his sins and asks his father for forgiveness? Is he fully restored and taken into the banquet?


Or is this the end of the story? Upon hearing this, the older son being outraged, picked up a piece of wood, beat his father to death. It would be a few months before the Pharisees would kill and nail Jesus to a piece of wood. They would believe it would be an act of honor to protect the nation, the people and religion of the one who came to shame it. The son was striking the father with crushing blows and saying, “you are evil, someone has to bring honor and dignity to this family by ridding one who has brought shame to this family,” as he beats his father to death.

The father who should have beaten the son was instead beaten and killed by the son; the greatest act of evil ever. They thought they were righteous. They did not understand love, mercy and grace. God uses that act of murder as the means by which he purchases our salvation. It all ends at the cross. Christ took the shame for us. He took the shame so that we could be at the celebration and fully reconciled with him.

The question remains…who are you? Are you the runaway son, the resentful elder son or the loving father who loves his sons beyond all measure? Are you quick to restore, quick to forgive no matter how much it may cost you? Or are you resentful, bitter and not wanting to let go of the past and start fresh.

Any prodigal can rise up from the filth and return home. The father will be expecting him.






























Comments
on Jun 16, 2006
Wow, that one was longer...and for some reason harder to read....harder to follow I guess.

A couple questions.

1.) Where in the story does it mention a town? It speaks of the father seeing his son on the road, but I don't see anything about a town. And if there was a town between father and son....how did the father see through the town?

2.) Everyone always gets on the big brother, but I would be a bit miffed if I were him myself. He stays and does the right thing even though you believe he obviously doesn't want too (I am not so convinced.)....and his father rewards his brother's bad behavior. I don't know if I'd be in a partying mood if my brother took his portion of the inheritance, blew it on booze and whores, then came home to live off the fruit of my labor.

I'd get over it, but it wouldn't sit well with me either at first.

Good article.

Thanks.
on Jun 16, 2006
Good questions.

Where in the story does it mention a town?


It doesn't really mention a town only saying the boy left his father's home for the far country. But you can see from reading the OT how the Jews settled into groups according to tribes and we read about the men who would sit at the gate (book of Ruth for example). During the time of the story remember there were towns mentioned.... Jesus coming from Nazareth with other towns mentioned thru the gospels.

but I would be a bit miffed if I were him myself


I've been here and not so sure I'm done being here. But Jesus I believe from reading this was drawing a picture showing the Pharisees that they were the elder brother. God is not the God they have pictured in their minds but one of compassion and mercy. The thing here we need to concentrate on is this boy was repentant. He wasn't "in your face" take me back I deserve to be here. He was truly sorry. I'm sure there were consequences that we're not aware of but that wasn't important to this story. We know that he spent his inheritance so there would be no more for him when his father died.

Sorry for the length....I actually cut it down. My teaching on this goes further but you get the jist.



on Jun 17, 2006
My teaching on this goes further but you get the jist.


Your teaching? Now, would that be 'teaching' you've received from others? Or something you've thought up yourself - because we all know what the position of the New Testament on women teachers is. Don't we?
on Jun 17, 2006
- because we all know what the position of the New Testament on women teachers is. Don't we?


women are allowed to teach other women. or if there isn't a man present who is able to teach.
on Jun 17, 2006
Your teaching? Now, would that be 'teaching' you've received from others? Or something you've thought up yourself - because we all know what the position of the New Testament on women teachers is. Don't we?


There is nothing wrong with women teaching and instructing other women, as Jlaur mentioned, which is what I do. I'm a firm believer in men teaching men and women teaching women (for the most part)especially dealing with spiritul matters. I think it works better that way.

Regardless, if it's man or woman teachers, we can only go as far as God has revealed to us. So it's not really what we have "thought up" but all that He has given us.
on Jun 18, 2006

if it's man or woman teachers, we can only go as far as God has revealed to us.

I do believe the Holy Spirit is the great teacher....and anyone who "teaches" is just facilitating the group, taking care of mechanics.

I won't be part of any woman's group where the facilitator thinks she is further in her walk than the other ladies.  Or who thinks she is always right....because she's not, and never can be.

I can't get past the stubbornness and find myself arguing more than is really necessary.

The best groups I've studied in have approached the study from a "Lets see what we can learn together" perspective.  Not a "I am the teacher listen to me talk" kinda thing.  And the very best groups were led by the most humble and unassuming people in my church.....that approach lends itself to a lotta love within the group....

Sorry didn't mean to ramble....just thinking about my last group and how much I miss not being able to go this summer.

on Jun 18, 2006
In all my years of going to studies whether it be local or a group of women going to a conference I've never had that feeling that one was lording it over the other ladies. I recently went to a Beth Moore weekend retreat study and I came away in awe of what God can do by seeing her at work. I can see quite clearly that she is further along in her walk than I. That didn't lend me to resent her for it. It encouraged me to be like she as she walks with Christ. Her desire is for us to love and know God as she does. Her heart was for us ladies. But yes, she definitely was way ahead of me. I have to do some running to catch up with her.

We all are at different walks in our spiritual lifves and we can learn from each other as we do. The one thing we need to bring to the table tho is a teachable spirit. Ultimately the HS is the great teacher but God has also gifted many in the church to be teachers and others that are gifted elsewhere but not in teaching.



on Jun 18, 2006
I can see quite clearly that she is further along in her walk than I. That didn't lend me to resent her for it.


I wasn't suggesting that. It is one thing to acknowledge a woman is "mature" in her faith. It is an entirely different matter for a woman to assume she is further ahead in her walk than those in the class simply because she has the gift of teaching. Having the gift of teaching does not automatically make one further along in their walk than others with different gifts.

I have been in a few groups led by women who felt they were "further" than the rest of the class. And that very arrogance is exactly why they weren't and why without exception the classes broke up before the study was over.

They had a gift for teaching, yes, but not so much a gift for applying what they taught to their own lives (humility, gentleness, kindness etc). I was speaking specifically about this kind of experience.