How To Destroy America

Scary

Published on April 1, 2006 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Politics

A Frightening Analysis

This is a speech given about 2 years ago but still worth repeating. Have you heard this?

We all know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an immigration-overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of American's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor named Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration — both legal and illegal — was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.

Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"

"Here is how they do it," Lamm said: First to destroy America, "Turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."

Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

Third, "We could make the United States a 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved! Not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.'"

Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."

"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."

"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity! Unity is what it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games.

A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to over come two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell.

"E. Pluribus Unum" — From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."

"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits ~ make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'x! xenophobes' halt discussion and debate."

"Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."

In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said, "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."

There was no applause.

A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today. Every discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America — take note of California and other states — to date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance is strength."

Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy are deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.

Link

"

Comments (Page 2)

Dr Guy

on Apr 03, 2006

That's why I laugh when I hear people characterize Republicans as the ones who are stolid defenders of values against the flow of social evolution. Such ignores the fact that their mirrors are just blindly defending boomer liberalism, no different than if they were chanting "the bible tells me so".

The Jabberwocky is working overtime I see! Excellent point.

bakerstreet

on Apr 03, 2006

"Right, but when our great-grandparents came here, they were expected, and indeed even WANTED, to assimilate."

That's not really true, we just ghettoized them. There were neighborhoods in every major American city, and many non-major ones. I just saw a documentary on the Japanese in America during WW2, and so many of the immigrants couldn't speak English. They had their own banks, businesses, and they "understood" that wandering out of their part of the city wasn't in their best interest.

Almost every ethnicity was like that. It's easy to preserve your illusion that we have a homogeneous society because we so deftly kept them in little pens. Now, it isn't so easy, and you've lost your illusions. Sucks to be you, I guess, but that doesn't mean your illusion has ever been reality. Even white immigrants; the polish, the irish, the jews, the russians, all clumped in little neighborhoods and only were accepted when they disguised themselves with what you're referring to as culture.

"This is not a good change. It IS diluting our identity, this lack of a sense of unity (that saw us through other wars, for example), and is only serving to weaken us."

Who are you talking about when you say "our"? I think you mean "my", or at least "my ethnicity's". You've got no more business telling anyone what American culture is than they have telling you. American culture simply "is", as a reflection of who lives here. Efforts to preserve some illusion of what it "should" be is just hateful, in my opinion.

I have said similar things to what you are saying, but it isn't because I fear the dilution of the great wonderbread non-culture, rather the dilution of all the cultures that we have fed upon. We want japanese home decorating and chinese food and mississippi blues but we damn well don't want any of them to be considered American, so we strangle the culture out of the people who gave us those very things.

Shame on you, frankly. You're supporting a non-culture, in my opinion. I come from the whitest of white areas, the mountain people of southern Appalachia, Deliverence land, and I have seen what your so-called "American" culture has done to my own people. You aren't talking about a way of life, you're talking about a vaccuum that sucks the color out of everyone and makes them neat little members of the country club.

on Apr 03, 2006

I decided to write a blog to reply to this. https://forums.joeuser.com/Forums.aspx?ForumID=6&AID=111390

Rightwinger

on Apr 04, 2006

Almost every ethnicity was like that. It's easy to preserve your illusion that we have a homogeneous society because we so deftly kept them in little pens. Now, it isn't so easy, and you've lost your illusions. Sucks to be you, I guess, but that doesn't mean your illusion has ever been reality. Even white immigrants; the polish, the irish, the jews, the russians, all clumped in little neighborhoods and only were accepted when they disguised themselves with what you're referring to as culture.

You used to be a lot less hostile to opposing views, Baker. What's up lately?

As I said, if they wanted to speak their native languages and keep their traditions in their own homes and neighborhoods, fine. That's what America is built on, yes. Diversity. A whole lot of our traditions, foods and styles are based on those from other nations, after all. I love Chinese and Mexican foods.
But it's not good when they're encouraged to keep their loyalties to their native cultures and beliefs, even as they enjoy the benefits of American citizenship. That's what bothers me. They're not required to assimilate anymore; if you want to be American, it's okay to still be German, Russian, Arabian, whatever......that's what weakens us.
To be a strong, cohesive nation, everyone in it has to agree to do what's best for their country. German and Japanese immigrants less than one generation off the boat fought in both WWI and II, for our side, because they wanted to defend their country and its interests.
Hell, an entire division of Nisei (Japanese-Americans)which were kept in internment camps, volunteered to fight in Europe, just to show their loyalty as Americans. They were one of the most highly-decorated divisions in the whole war. We've allowed that ideal to become muddied by encouraging our immigrants to keep their own identities from the Old Country and not assimilate into America as loyal Americans.
I don't see any divisions of "loyal American" Iraqi immigrants in uniforms, do you?

bakerstreet

on Apr 04, 2006

"But it's not good when they're encouraged to keep their loyalties to their native cultures and beliefs, even as they enjoy the benefits of American citizenship."

...do you hear yourself? It's not good that an American citizen is encoraged to stay loyal to their native cultures and beliefs? You can actually utter that and then wonder what is annoying about it?

Perhaps you could enlighten us about what real American culture and belief happens to be, in case some of us aren't in line with it either. There used to be schools for Native Americans that were meant to squeeze the native culture out of them, but they didn't work out too well.

"They're not required to assimilate anymore; if you want to be American, it's okay to still be German, Russian, Arabian, whatever......that's what weakens us. "

How, exactly does it weaken us? What are they omitting from their American experience? You can talk about "American" like it is some sort of definition, but you couldn't for a moment define what it is. Obviously they aren't required to agree with you politically, since many people of your own culture don't. They aren't required to fall in line religiously. What do you propose they do more than they are to "support their country?" How they dress?

Most of those Japanese who fought in WW2 went right back to their Japanese communities and went right on living as people of Japanese culture right here in the US. Some I saw interviewed spoke Japanese during the interview. A shame they didn't assimilate.

"I don't see any divisions of "loyal American" Iraqi immigrants in uniforms, do you?"

No, because thank God we are no longer nasty racists who divide up our armed forces into colored or iraqi or japanese divisions anymore. You have no idea whatsoever how many Americans in the military come from an Iraqi heritage.

I would suggest you think really hard about what American culture is. Don't include Irish culture, or Polish culture, or Jewish culture, or British culture, or French culture or any other that isn't "American". You subtract all that and then let me know what's left over.

You aren't asking people to adopt a culture, you're asking them to be cultureless. There is no American culture that isn't impossibly tied to a half-dozen other ethnicities and cultures.

bakerstreet

on Apr 04, 2006

I have to be honest with you, Rightwinger, and tell you that I think the things you have said here have been bigoted and ignorant. I don't like illegal immigration, and I don't like folks that come in and simply take what they can and leave.

But to tell people who are just as "American" as you that they need to assimilate to your beliefs and culture is about as unamerican as it gets. You sound just like WW2 era Germans talking about their Volk, and how the influx of other cultures weakened it.

As someone who has seen his own culture dissolved into the great American wonderbread wasteland, I think you should reflect on what culture mainstream America has left. I think you'll find little there to point to that isn't as generic as a TV newscaster. That isn't good, that's tragic.

KFC Kickin For Christ

on Apr 04, 2006

A few years ago I spent a week in FL when my son's basketball team went to the National Playoffs. I was extremely upset to find all the workers in the hotel couldn't speak English. To ask for an extra towel or for them to clean a room was bothersome. They would look at me blankly when I asked a question. To me, this was un-American. Half of the time I did not get what I requested most likely because they did not understand.

One of the differences between the immigrants of yesteryear and today is the desire to learn our language. In the past learning the language and quickly was advantageous but today, it doesn't seem to matter. There's plenty of work for them whether or not they can speak the language of this country. I agree with RW. How can we come together as a whole when we can't even understand each other? Can you imagine what the Revolutionary War would have looked like or even the Civil War with people of all languages working together side by side?

I felt like I was the odd man out here in my own country just asking for help getting the basic things in life. If I didn't know any better I would have thought I was in Cuba or Mexico. I have decided the next time I will check out and find another hotel if possible. I'm sorry if that sounds bigoted or ignorant, but when I stay in an American hotel I expect to converse to the employees in my own language. If I stay in a Hotel in Mexico, I do not expect that but fully expect to be the minority.....but not here in my own country.

You used to be a lot less hostile to opposing views, Baker. What's up lately?

ya Baker.....what's up?

bakerstreet

on Apr 04, 2006

"ya Baker.....what's up?"

Someone says that American citizens shouldn't be allowed to be loyal to their cultures and beliefs, and you ask ME what's wrong? What's wrong with you that you aren't outraged? I've been fighting myself not to come out and call it a Nazi point of view, but if it quacks like a duck...

"One of the differences between the immigrants of yesteryear and today is the desire to learn our language."

As I said above, that's a myth. We have always had huge immigrant areas in every major city with lots of people who didn't speak English. In the past they were just too afraid of the attitudes portrayed here to wander out. Sadly, we've given them the impression that we're different now. Evidently, we aren't.

"How can we come together as a whole when we can't even understand each other?"

In a nation with a double digit percent of people who don't speak English, how can we come together if people insist on refusing to learn a second language just because they are too bigoted and stubborn to do so?

"Can you imagine what the Revolutionary War would have looked like or even the Civil War with people of all languages working together side by side? "

You mean, like, German Hessians fighting with the British and Frenchmen fighting with the Colonists?

"I felt like I was the odd man out here in my own country just asking for help getting the basic things in life."

It's their country, too.

"I'm sorry if that sounds bigoted or ignorant, but when I stay in an American hotel I expect to converse to the employees in my own language."

No, you obviously aren't sorry. There is no "American" language that should be spoken in American hotels. You speak English, not American. Many of the words you use every day aren't even English. You don't have "my own language". Get used to the idea; anything else is trying to hold back the tide with a broom.

It's hopeless. I'll stop interfering in your volkish love-in and write my own blog on it.

kingbee

on Apr 04, 2006

we just ghettoized them. There were neighborhoods in every major American city, and many non-major ones. I just saw a documentary on the Japanese in America during WW2, and so many of the immigrants couldn't speak English. They had their own banks, businesses, and they "understood" that wandering out of their part of the city wasn't in their best interest.

i've pointed this out in several previous discussions in which it was claimed a.) previous generations of immigrants could hardly wait til they were handed a shovel, not merely cuz it was a tool with which to work 16 hours a day so they could buy cool clothes to wear hunting foxes with big american breasts but because it was the 19th century equivalent of an electronic translator--a screen on which they could write with charred sticks ala lincoln--enabling them to learn english within weeks. b.) todays newcomers are so arrogantly determined to impose their cultural, national traditions and language on us they happily subdivide garages in order to stay close to their homeboys & girls.

you've said it so much more skillfully, bakerstreet. i'm truly humbled.

KFC Kickin For Christ

on Apr 04, 2006

Someone says that American citizens shouldn't be allowed to be loyal to their cultures and beliefs, and you ask ME what's wrong? What's wrong with you that you aren't outraged?

I never said that. I think having traditions in one's own culture is great, and I love learning about other cultures. I have no problem with that even if they celebrate these things in this country.

So you're saying what? We need to learn Arabic so we can learn to discuss with our Arabic neighbors? We need to learn Spanish and French as well so we can know how to ask for a towel in said language?

You mean, like, German Hessians fighting with the British and Frenchmen fighting with the Colonists?

and what percentage are we talking here? Now imagine you're on the front line with an Arabic youth on your right and a spanish man on your left; your life is depending on them. You're barking out orders to them. How does this work?

So you think that's the reason many don't speak a second, third or fourth language? Because they are bigoted and stubborn? Well in the school system I grew up in I was offered French and Latin. That's it. As you most likely know, the best time to learn a language is when one is young. I do not believe I was bigoted and/or stubborn because I cannot converse in another language. You're way out of line here Baker.

It's their country, too.

then they should learn to speak the language of this country. I would expect no less myself if I moved to Brazil, Korea or Russia. I would learn the language and do my best to speak it out of respect for my new adopted country.

Zoomba

on Apr 04, 2006

Actually, Baker is no more or less hostile than he usually gets with people who disagree with him on something he believes strongly in... this is just the first time you've probably been on the receiving end of it.

cactoblasta

on Apr 04, 2006

As you said yourself that's not easy for those who aren't schoolkids. Have you met a full citizen who cannot speak English whatsoever? Why should they have to speak broken English to each other when Spanish or Italian or Arabic or Japanese is so much easier?

And anyway, the country is enriched through a multilingual populace. It improves national security (a wider language base means a wider agent base) and it improves communicative efficiency, because borrowing of useful words from other tongues will become more common.

It's certainly nothing to fear unless you believe your children's development should be stunted by only teaching them English. You'll probably be dead soon (ie within the next 50 years or so), so there's no point worrying overly much about your generation's lack of language skills. The future is far more important.

cactoblasta

on Apr 04, 2006

That's true enough. I've exchanged words with Baker on a number of topics and he doesn't sound much different here.

bakerstreet

on Apr 04, 2006

" never said that. I think having traditions in one's own culture is great, and I love learning about other cultures. I have no problem with that even if they celebrate these things in this country. "

No, but rightwinger did, and yet you can't understand why I would react strongly to it?

"So you're saying what? We need to learn Arabic so we can learn to discuss with our Arabic neighbors? We need to learn Spanish and French as well so we can know how to ask for a towel in said language? "

No, but if you frequent areas that are predominately filled with people who speak spanish, it is irrational to stubbornly refuse to learn how to say "May I have a towel". Or you could call the front desk and have them ask.

"So you think that's the reason many don't speak a second, third or fourth language? Because they are bigoted and stubborn? Well in the school system I grew up in I was offered French and Latin. That's it. As you most likely know, the best time to learn a language is when one is young. I do not believe I was bigoted and/or stubborn because I cannot converse in another language. You're way out of line here Baker. "

So I am out of line for asking adults who live in a first-world, prosperous nation with education galore to learn a second language, and you are not out of line for expecting adults who come from impoverished nations to do so?

How much easier is it for you to learn a smattering of Spanish than it is for them to learn English? You certainly have a computer and access to the Internet, and therefore the free resources to learn how to ask for a towel. Do they? You can't take a few minutes a day to learn a second language, but they clean your toilet in the hotel for 8 hours, take care of their family, and still have the time and energy to learn English, no doubt.

"then they should learn to speak the language of this country. I would expect no less myself if I moved to Brazil, Korea or Russia. I would learn the language and do my best to speak it out of respect for my new adopted country. "

You'll find people in those nations, living with a much lower standard of living than you, already speak a lot of English. You'll find that when you ask for a towel in their hotels, they'll often understand what you are saying. They are much more accepting of people who bother visiting and migrating to their nations. Perhaps you should grant that respect to the people who fetch your towels.

Demanding that people educate themselves so that you can stay ignorant is sad, especially when those people are making your food, trimming your lawn, and picking your fruit. it's pretty hypocritical to laud how learning English is in their best interest when you at the same time admit that you encounter problem situations because you refuse to learn a little Spanish.

drmiler

on Apr 04, 2006

One of the differences between the immigrants of yesteryear and today is the desire to learn our language."

As I said above, that's a myth. We have always had huge immigrant areas in every major city with lots of people who didn't speak English. In the past they were just too afraid of the attitudes portrayed here to wander out. Sadly, we've given them the impression that we're different now. Evidently, we aren't

Sorry baker but in this instance you're only partially correct. BTW most weren't just "immigrants" they were naturalized citizens!
From the US immigration page:

General Requirements: All naturalization applicants must demonstrate good moral character. The other naturalization requirements may be modified or waived for certain applicants, such as spouses of U.S. Citizens.
A period of continuous residence and physical presence in the United States
An ability to read, write and speak English
Good moral character
Knowledge of the principles of the U.S. Constitution
Favorable disposition toward the United States

Demanding that people educate themselves so that you can stay ignorant is sad, especially when those people are making your food, trimming your lawn, and picking your fruit. it's pretty hypocritical to laud how learning English is in their best interest when you at the same time admit that you encounter problem situations because you refuse to learn a little Spanish.

And "why" should he have to learn spanish? Does he live in a spanish speaking country? No. he lives in America, where we speak "English"! They want to immigrate here and do it legally? Fine. They want to keep their customs and language? Also fine. They want to work here? Then let them learn the damn language! It is neither right or fair to the rest of us that we have to learn their language to recieve decent service while in America. You want decent service in Mexico? Learn spanish! For those serving here, learn english!

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!