A Live Tea Party Moment

When One Stunned The Crowd!

Published on June 9, 2010 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Politics

My friend sent me this from one of the Tea Parties.

This is a Tea Party that my brother-in-law Bob and his wife Judy went to yesterday afternoon in Villa Rica Ga. Most people don't even know the second verse of The Star Spangled Banner but here it is, hope you enjoy it, they certainly did. Judy and Bob are not visable in the video but they were four rows directly beyond the singer. It was an absolutely wonderful party, wish everyone could attend.

Herman Cain lead a Q&A session at the Douglas County Tea Party...the crowd was not expecting what happened next...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9_bP219ehQ

Comments (Page 2)

the_Peoples_Party

on Jun 11, 2010

lulapilgrim

comment 14

A. The song was written 200 years ago when christianity was the main religion of both the British Empire and the fledgeling USA.
That is a stretch. Yes, the US was and still is a predominantly Christian nation,
I use to think so, but I'm not so sure anymore that the US is a predominantly Christian nation. From what I see the general tenor of society is no longer Christian, far from it, at least not in the true sense of being Christian.
And some are actively and even militantly anti-Christian.
For me, that's one of the reasons why I admire these Tea Parties...they are out there standing up for convictions that are similiar to my own. They understand freedom need to be protected.

Yes, I agree with this Lula. I think the appropriate term would be cultural christians.

Dr Guy

on Jun 11, 2010

I use to think so, but I'm not so sure anymore that the US is a predominantly Christian nation. From what I see the general tenor of society is no longer Christian, far from it, at least not in the true sense of being Christian.

Predominantly - as in the largest group is Christian. I have no idea how many are practicing, just expressing a belief, or raised that way and no longer profess any association.

lulapilgrim

on Jun 11, 2010

B. It calls for us to conquer when our cause is just, and yet you have no problem with the fact that we haven't invaded any of the south american countries that feed drugs into the US.

The key here is the "cause must be just". In this case, conquering our demand for illegal drugs would be the just cause.

lulapilgrim

on Jun 11, 2010

Predominantly - as in the largest group is Christian.

OK...statistically speaking.

KFC Kickin For Christ

on Jun 11, 2010

Yes, I agree with this Lula. I think the appropriate term would be cultural christians.

I agree as well. The old saying.... a teabag doesn't know what its made of until it's in hot water" is true for Christians as well. It's during times of crisis and tribulations that we really find out where we're at and what we're really made of.

Predominantly - as in the largest group is Christian. I have no idea how many are practicing, just expressing a belief, or raised that way and no longer profess any association.

I know alot of people say they are Christians but they're really not..not in the genuine sense. My grandmother, for instance calls herself Christian because, to her, the only alternative was to be a Jew. So she'd say "well I'm not a Jew." She hasn't been to church in over 70 years and professes no belief system but yet still thinks of herself as a Christian but she definitely doesn't follow Christ.

The way I see it is, there are "professing" Christians and "possessing" Christians. To profess something really means nothing. It's those that possess their faith reveal changed lives. It's one thing to say; another to act.

Dr Guy

on Jun 11, 2010

The way I see it is, there are "professing" Christians and "possessing" Christians. To profess something really means nothing.

Yes. I am not judging who is a professor and who is a possessor. But that is a good way to put it for those looking for people who LIVE Christian, versus have it marked on their birth certificate.

BONEHEADdb

on Jun 12, 2010

In general, if you get offended by the use of the word you in that sentence, you should consider yourself part of the group that I am talking to.

Offended? No.

Amused by your ignorant assumption would be more accurate. I am most certainly one of those you wish to offend but I have no qualms about dumping some napalm on coca fields in any country.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!