No Blood, Violence, Sex and.....Religion?
Published on April 2, 2008 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Current Events

We have yet another ridiculous argument which has now gone to litigation in the school system.  No wonder the parents are homeschooling their kids in droves these days.  Have we lost our minds? 

A Wisconsin school system is facing a lawsuit because a high school teacher gave a student a zero on an art project because the student had a picture of a cross in it. 

At least the kid did the work!  Golly!  How many kids are even doing the work nowadays?  How can you give a kid a zero for painting a cross in a picture?  If it were a Nazi cross would that have been ok? 

Get this:  The school district argues that the student voluntarily waived his First Amendment religious freedoms when he entered the classroom.

Really?  This is legal?  Since when?  Seems it's ok to drop the F-bomb nowadays in the schools and not worry about losing their First Amendment Rights.  Heck, the teachers are dropping these bombs now. 

He was told he forfeited his First Amendment rights when he included a cross and the words "John 3:16, a sign of love" in his art project.  He was told to either cover up the scripture reference or put a border over it. 

He refused and he received a zero for the project.  She showed him a policy that every student has to sign,  It says in the policy that there is to be, 'No blood. No violence. No sex' and 'No religion citing they lose their First Amendment rights when they walk in the door. 

The kid, one of the top students in his class, was not intimidated.  He tore the policy in two, handed it back to the teacher and called it illegal. 

In fact, says the lawyers, this policy actually favors one religion over another.  This same teacher allowed pictures of demonic, evil-looking beings as part of these assignments, but yet wouldn't allow a small cross and a scripture verse.  Why is this so threatening?  How scary is a simple cross? 

The pro-family Cortman said this:  "What's most offensive about this case and most egregious in the actions by the school district is the fact that their policy lumps blood, violence, sex, and religion as if those four things are equal. 

What kind of message is the government school system trying to send here? 

 


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Apr 03, 2008
Recently the IRS has come up with a new tax law. It used to be they left non-profits alone if they made under a certain amount. That would include churches, food pantries etc. Now...they want every non-profit to file a return regardless of amount they brought in. Why do you suppose they want to all of a sudden keep track of these non-profits? I'm sure we'll find out in the not so distant future. This outlawing homeschool....was just the beginning. I think it may have been an "oops" moment. The timing wasn't quite right. But it's coming.


Wow, 9/11 conspiracies are looking like jokes after this bit of scare tactics.
on Apr 03, 2008

I'm sorry KFC but not every "demon" represents a religious creature.

where are demons first mentioned in ancient literature?  If you wanted to find out about demons what book would you honestly think of first?  Demonology is just as religious as drawing a cross is.  They're just on opposite sides of the fence...so to speak.  Good vs evil.  One kid can draw  his version of evil...but another can't combat that with his version of good? 

I'm sure those people that burned on the stakes had lawyers just like today and opportunities to make money out of the persecutions they endured.

ya, ok Charles.  I guess you weren't paying attention in history class. 

Wow, 9/11 conspiracies are looking like jokes after this bit of scare tactics.

so that's why you think I wrote this?  I knew this for a while now.  It has nothing to do with conspiracies.  Check with your local accountant and ask him yourself.

 

on Apr 03, 2008
Demonology is just as religious as drawing a cross is.


Mmm...no, not necessarily. "Demon" is synonymous in a lot of places with "monster." Sometimes they're not even inherently bad...they can be good too. They're viewed as supernatural creatures in a lot of places...so unless dragons and unicorns count as religious symbols, I'd be hesistant to classify demons as solely religion based. Don't get me wrong, they are often associated with religion, but not totally. In Christian mythos they're firmly rooted as agents of hell...but for instance, in Japan they are creatures of nature and can take on many forms many of which aren't evil in any way.


~Zoo
on Apr 04, 2008

The worst part of this act of Unconstitutionality by the teacher was, she told the student that his artwork infringed on the other students' rights,  because they shouldn't have to be exposed to his religion.

Apparently to that waste of a paycheck teacher, merely seeing a cross is being "exposed to religion".  Meanwhile all manner of satanism and anti American symbolism can be openly displayed and if students don't want to be exposed to it, it is their own responsibility to "just not look at it".

It's about time Christians started questioning the illegal infringement of our rights.  For too long, if anyone takes offense to anything, it becomes a federal case... unless of course, you are Christian... then you are just supposed to "understand".

The Teacher was dead wrong.  She needs a long course on the U.S. Constitution...  and so does anyone else who thinks she was in the right.

on Apr 04, 2008

The worst part of this act of Unconstitutionality by the teacher was, she told the student that his artwork infringed on the other students' rights, because they shouldn't have to be exposed to his religion. Apparently to that waste of a paycheck teacher, merely seeing a cross is being "exposed to religion". Meanwhile all manner of satanism and anti American symbolism can be openly displayed and if students don't want to be exposed to it, it is their own responsibility to "just not look at it". It's about time Christians started questioning the illegal infringement of our rights. For too long, if anyone takes offense to anything, it becomes a federal case... unless of course, you are Christian... then you are just supposed to "understand". The Teacher was dead wrong. She needs a long course on the U.S. Constitution... and so does anyone else who thinks she was in the right.

This was so excellent it needed to be repeated.  Thanks Ted!  You, my man, are right on!

on Apr 04, 2008
where are demons first mentioned in ancient literature? If you wanted to find out about demons what book would you honestly think of first? Demonology is just as religious as drawing a cross is. They're just on opposite sides of the fence...so to speak. Good vs evil. One kid can draw his version of evil...but another can't combat that with his version of good?


As zoo said, not everyone sees demons as religious or even bad. But what else other than religious could John 3:16 refer too? Stone Cold Steve Austin?

ya, ok Charles. I guess you weren't paying attention in history class.


So you are saying there were lawyers defending these people and throwing lawsuits for monetary compensation? Man, those were some terrible lawyers.

so that's why you think I wrote this? I knew this for a while now. It has nothing to do with conspiracies. Check with your local accountant and ask him yourself.


I'm sure you asked every single accountant out there right? Nothing funnier than a majority Christian country trying to root out and hurt Christian people and their churches. LOL. The only reason I can think of for doing such a thing is to appease to people of other religious faiths such as Islam, but then we are doing bad things to them to, right?
on Apr 04, 2008
ummmm Charles...my husband is a CPA and works at a medium sized firm. So I get firsthand info when new tax laws come out....just stuff we discuss from time to time.

This is NOT considered a Christian nation anymore. Maybe to some it still is, but the scuttlebutt these days is it's a post-Christian nation now. We've pretty much taken God out of everything but our money and our Pledge to the Flag and there's talk about taking that out as well.

If it were a Christian nation, this kid would not have gotten a 0 for drawing a cross on his paper.
on Apr 04, 2008
I agree, but that doesn't mean the entire government is trying to eradicate Christianity in this country, as several have tried to assert recently.


True. We have to keep it in perspective here. His rights were violated, but he wasn't persecuted. The teacher was wrong for what she did, now he gets to exercise his right to stand up for his beliefs.
on Apr 04, 2008

The point I've been making is that these wrongs can be corrected, with the wrongdoers being punished and the victims compensated, so it all comes out in the wash. Only when a government offers no recourse, when your kid gets a failing grade over something like this and there's nowhere to turn, that we need to worry.

Yes, I agree and this is something I, for one, don't take for granted.  Quite often I hear Christians pray they are very thankful that we can still be free to worship how and when we want. 

I tend to think many christians don't want to believe this because of course, that might mean the 'end times' aren't as close as they hope for

maybe....but there are so many other signs of the times to take into account.....I wouldn't look just at this one small part and scream...."end of the world."  I think you know me better than that LW. 

It's kind of sick in a way, hoping for the end, and eagerly seeking out signs of its impending arrival, almost as if they can hardly wait to see all us heathens get whats coming to us.

and this is just plain and straight......way off the mark.  We don't want anyone to go to a Christless eternity.  That's why we preach like we do.  I mean...heck if we didn't care....we'd leave you ignorant of it all.   We want you to know what's coming so you can be prepared.  We hope for the end because it's like we are travelers in a world that wasn't meant for us...and travelers get weary and restless for being home where they belong. 

on Apr 04, 2008

It's one thing to tell somebody, KFC, it's another to tell them over and over and over and over and make the repetition of the tale the entire focus of your life, even when it makes you insufferably annoying 99% of the time.

ha!  but it's that 1% I live for! 

 

on Apr 07, 2008

Seriously not cool. One always should have the right to put any symbol, assuming appropriate content, into their work.


No blood, no sex, no whatnot, but a cross is one of the simplest symbols, and there should be no penalty for puting it in art.

 

--Christian, BTW.

2 Pages1 2