Where O Where Are The Alarmists Now?
Published on February 25, 2008 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Current Events

These days I have been so glad to have made the choice to move South.  It is so nice down here and knowing what I left behind, weather wise, makes it that much sweeter.  Everyone tells us we got out just in time.  Many are making plans on coming to see us.  They are just sick of all this snow. 

Lately, we've been getting lots of phone calls and pictures over the net from friends and family back home.  They are enduring a tough winter.  Actually it's been pretty brutal with almost record amounts of snowfall.  Actually I think one more storm may put them into the record books from what I hear.  Last I knew they had about 110 inches of snow with more on the way.  I just heard they are expecting another 10 inches of the heavy white stuff.    With some of the snowbanks as high as 20 feet I can only imagine the dread of yet another storm on the way. 

Where to put it?  That's the problem for my Northern friends.  Some have been getting bucket loaders to cart this snow away because there just isn't any more room.  Driveways and streets are are narrowing with every snowstorm.  The school kids have used up as many as seven snow days with the prediction they will be in school until the near end of June so far.  There also have been many roofs caving in and quite a few are now scrambling to shovel off their roofs before they suffer the same fate. 

I've also heard this may be the breaking point for many on the fence about moving South.  My Dad, whom I never ever imagined would even think of moving from Maine told me he's even let this thought cross his mind.  He's such a Maine Hick.  He's the only one I said I couldn't picture moving here.

So, with all this going on all over the Northeast and Mid-West I have to ask, where are the global warmists these days?  I haven't heard a peep out of them.  Has anyone else? 

I read this today:

A prominent global-warming critic says many scientists believe that this winter's weather could point to a future cooling trend.

Marc Morano is the resident authority on global warming with the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works minority staff. He says according to records kept by the United Nations, global average temperatures peaked during the El Nino year of 1998 -- and that since 2001, the temperature trend has declined slightly.
 
According to Morano, despite the continued pumping of CO2 into the atmosphere, the southern hemisphere has also experienced a cooling trend; and in the northern hemisphere, January 2008, by some estimates, was the coldest month in more than a decade.
 
"Solar scientists are worried about the lows," he says. "They're calling it the 'disturbingly quiet solar cycle.' And we're faced with again just a lack of years ... of temperatures just sort of 'plateau-ing out' to the point where the head of the U.N. IPCC [Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change] has recently called for an investigation as to why temperatures were not continuing to rise as predicted."
 
Morano also notes that between 1940 and 1975, the earth's temperature cooled even though CO2 levels rose. And global warming alarmists, he notes, have failed to explain the lack of a correlation between rising CO2 and rising temperatures, a theory that Al Gore promotes in his movie An Inconvenient Truth.

 

 

 

 


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 07, 2008
You are pretty sure? I have stated many times that the change is happening and there is nothing you can do about it.


There are a few things. Cleaning up the air and water in and around cities through reducing pollution will make life easier, longer and more enjoyable for everyone, but you're right, it won't stop climate change.

What we can do is put together contingency plans for the fallout of climate change. Our current models are hopelessly incompetent at predicting the future impact, so fixing them up would be a good first step.

Then researching the sites most likely to be affected would be wise. Some models suggest many Pacific island nations will be underwater in a century or less. Figuring out what to do with those hundreds of thousands of people is probably a good move, although it's not exactly urgent at the moment.

I'm against the idea that we should try and fix things on a macro-level (such as seeding the ocean or the sky with particulates), but there's no harm in letting consumer action reduce pollution/waste and looking into ways of minimising the negative impacts of climate change on a local level.
on Mar 08, 2008
So, lower temperatures is the result of global warming.

Natch.
on Mar 08, 2008
There are a few things. Cleaning up the air and water in and around cities through reducing pollution will make life easier, longer and more enjoyable for everyone, but you're right, it won't stop climate change.


Yes. But the lie is that we are causing it. We should (and are) addressing the pollution issue. We do not have to regress to bear skins and stone knives however to live, as the new religion would want us to.
on Mar 08, 2008

*sight* You don't know much about the global climate system, right? The whole point of global warming is that is will make the polar caps melt, which they have, it's a proven fact. But melted polar cap means that the northwestern passage is now open to boat traffic, and current can actually travel in the artic see between Atlantic and Pacific oceans, which leads to LOWER TEMPERATURES in America. So, lower temperatures is the result of global warming.

The Northwest passage would have a neglible effect on global temperatures.

Moreover, any theory that is true regardless of the data produced is not a theory, it's a religion.

Here is the Wikipedia entry on the Northwest passage:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Passage

I think it's a general good thing for humans to try to limit their impact on their environment. But I am extremely skeptical as to whether humans are having a noticeable impact on global climate at this point.

2 Pages1 2