Which Bathroom Do I Dare Use Today?

Male or Female-Take Your Pick? Really?

Published on October 13, 2007 By KFC Kickin For Christ In Current Events

Ok, more weird news in today's headlines. I just can't believe this.

"Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" have been banned from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger From what I understand these, terms could promote discrimination against homosexuals and we need to be inclusive and not be so insensitive. He also ordered public schools to allow boys to use girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they so choose. .

Really? So moms and dads of daughters out there, how do you feel about the boys checking on your girls in the girl's restroom now? Locker rooms too? Really?

Well I know for a fact that the college boys now check the girls' Myspace Page to find out all about her including all of her classes. Afterall her picture is posted, her birthday mentioned, her classes are listed as well as her likes and dislikes. So when he "accidentially" bumps into her after class, more than once, she starts to notice him. Then she finds out how much they have in common. Ya..... or....... so she thinks. Now he can even follow same girl into the locker/restroom. Really?

So with this latest from the Gov, many parents are shocked and dismayed that he has trampled the parental rights here. Values are irrevelant. I'm sure many parents will have no choice but to pull their kids out of California schools. We have a saying here in Maine......so goes California.....so goes the rest of the nation.

One of the bills includes SB777 which bans anything in public schools that could be interpreted as negative toward homosexuality, bisexuality and other alternative lifestyle choices. This bill prohibits any instruction or school-sponsored activity that promotes any sort of discrimatory bias against gender. This includes cross dressing, sex changes and orientation.

So if you decided this week to be female and next male, go ahead. Try it out. In the meantime you can use either gender bathroom for what is convenient for you this week. Boy Scouts? No longer. Girl Scouts? No longer. Afterall they would now be considered discrimatory against gender. I was wondering how Boys State and Girls State would be affected here. This is a selected program for HS Juniors with the reps from each gender to meet with others across the state and even the nation. Two of my boys were chosen for Boy's State. Now, can the CA boys chosen for Boy's State go to Girls State if they so choose?

Furthermore another bill AB394 targets parents and teachers for indoctrination through "anti-harassment" training. Of course we have to have this to implement what we want to indoctrinate. Slowly but surely this will spread but for a few zealots who will fight this to the death while being called intolerant in the process.

I want to know what does this have to do with reading, writing and arithmetic?

Comments (Page 2)

kingbee

on Oct 14, 2007

if someone does not vote YOUR line

not just my line.

any goldwater conservative worthy of his auh20 would steadfastly oppose amending our constitution to impose any religious standard--especially an amendment that opened bedroom doors to the government.

i apologize for referring to craig as a conservative and for insulting real conservatives by association.

Typical of the left.

yo mama

Jewbu

on Oct 14, 2007

I jut read the whole bill in question. I have to agree with Kingbee. There's nothing in this bill that makes it against the law to refer to moms and dads. It simply makes it illegal to discriminate on the basis of among other things, sexual orientation. Goodness, KFC, get a grip.

KFC Kickin For Christ

on Oct 15, 2007

Goodness, KFC, get a grip.

I read it also. I also read all the commentaries on it...and I agree with the assessments.

You wait and see the aftermath and we'll discuss it then.

Dr Guy

on Oct 15, 2007

what kinda conservative believes rights can be 'created' or destroyed? our constitution enumerates certain specific rights as a subset of human rights none of which may be legally limited nor curtailed and all of which our government is compelled to assert by force of law on behalf of all citizens.

Does it matter what we think? Or what congress does? And you are mixing the terms. There are certain "inalienable" rights. But every law passed by congress does not create those, but other rights. Do you think the government has an "in alienable right" to steal from the rich and give to the poor? Or was this "right" created by legislating?

with few notable exceptions, they were racists.

Which you just proved my point. So not everyone voting against those laws were racists, only the ones that did not agree with you?

this would be the same craig who insists he's exclusively hetrosexual? how else do you explain someone being so incredibly deep in denial?

So if I deny I am a homosexual, by your logic, I am a Homophobe. I can see your debating skills have gotten a whole lot better! NOT.

a CLINTON (jeez) policy that would be fine if implemented as intended.

And how did Clinton NOT implement it as intended? he had 8 years to do so.

With all that writing, all we got out of this was that Craig is a Homophobe because he voted against giving Gays extra rights, and why? because you say so.

And how is that different from "if he does not support my policies, then I must smear him with name calling because I dont know how to debate or sway his opinion"?

Brad got this treatment at the laughing monkey, and anyone not left of Mao gets it at du.org. I expect better at ju, but then I guess I expect to be dealing with adults, not school yard kids testing out their latest taunting phrases.

kingbee

on Oct 15, 2007

Do you think the government has an "in alienable right" to steal from the rich and give to the poor? Or was this "right" created by legislating?

what the hell are you talking about? no branch of our government has rights.

obligations, duties, powers and limitations are assigned to, conceded by or imposed upon government by the people through our constitution. no wonder you're so confused.

Dr Guy

on Oct 15, 2007

obligations, duties, powers and limitations are assigned to, conceded by or imposed upon government by the people through our constitution. no wonder you're so confused.

Then show me the rights he has denied them.

And I will rephrase for you.

Do you think that people have the right through the government to steal from the rich and give to the poor? Or was this "right" created by legislating?

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!